[DJ MacWoW]

Yes, but investigations have to yield evidence.

After there are suspicious circumstances there is an investigation. There are SUSPICIONS first.

You're asserting facts with no evidence,

Really? I said REPEATEDLY that the circumstances are SUSPICIOUS. Any facts I've given are part of public record. I also said that no one but Schiavo knows what happened. Post 539 for one. Don't try to twist what I've said.

[highball]

Okay, how's this for not twisting what you said.

In 562, you posted: "There is ZERO evidence that he did nothing to cause her collapse."

That's a nonsense statement. Nobody has to prove their innocence, because a negative is not proveable. You have to prove that he did it, and there is no evidence beyond wild suspicions that he did it.

[malakhi]

I said REPEATEDLY that the circumstances are SUSPICIOUS.

The police didn't seem to think so.

That 'conspiracy' again, I suppose.