And you are frightening for agreeing with someone who called the 90% of Freepers that are concerned about Terri's case "nuts", meaning crazy or mentally ill by any definition. That is slanderous, not to mention an immature tactic used by a juvenile when they can not win a argument.
I thought we were getting somewhere by convincing people that this is a State issue and now I find you are encouraging people who simply want to insult people here.
I am disappointed.
Boo!
the 90% of Freepers that are concerned about Terri's case
I don't care if it is 99%. I formed my opinion on this case on the basis of the facts in the court records, not by going along with popular opinion on this website.
That is slanderous
Technically, it would be 'libel', assuming you could prove that KDD's remarks were intended for all those freepers, including those who, while being on the other side of the issue, have discussed the subject reasonably. As for the others, well, truth is an absolute defense against a libel claim.
not to mention an immature tactic
Please make a point of pinging me when you call anyone on your side on "immature tactics".
and now I find you are encouraging people who simply want to insult people here.
How am I 'encouraging' them? By posting my opinions and correcting their factual errors?
I am disappointed.
Hold on... let me check...
Nope, still don't care.