Of course facts matter. What really matters is where you are getting those "facts" from. For instance, when looking for info on the war in Iraq, do you read birdcage liner, lamestream media, or come here?
I read the autopsy report several times. She wasn't blind when she was videotaped, nor was she blind when the family priest was allowed, ALLOWED, to pray with Terri. She wasn't blind when a new lawyer visited her before she was killed. She recognized a new face, liked that face, and proceeded to flirt with him. It's all here, look it up. I will concede that she could have fit the definition of "legally blind". She and the judge, who condemned her to death, have something in common.
I get my facts right. They just aren't the ones you are comfortable with.
From the actual court records and rulings, not from some tabloid rumormill like Empire Journal.
She wasn't blind when she was videotaped, nor was she blind when the family priest was allowed, ALLOWED, to pray with Terri. She wasn't blind when a new lawyer visited her before she was killed. She recognized a new face, liked that face, and proceeded to flirt with him. It's all here, look it up.
It seems that Terri was not the only one who is blind. Could you be any more uncritically credulous?