What does this mean, a lack of lobbyists in Washington? Lay-led Christian congregations?
I don't understand how George Bush's Republican Government is helping to move us in the direction of ideals expressed in your post.
Why do you suppose she shoots off her mouth and refuses to provide even one post of criticism? It is because she is a typical DemocRAT. If Clinton were in charge right now, the invasion of Iraq would be fine. That is what it is about.
Milosevic was a minor leaguer compared to the mass graves of Saddam Hussein. But it doesn't matter. George Bush is in charge so it is bad. She doesn't give a damn that what she and the others on the left are doing does damage to our troops morale. It is all about politics.
Intellectual honesty? MurryMom doesn't need no stinking intellectual honesty.
It mostly isn't. On the other hand, a Kerry Narcisistic Communist government would lead away from those ideals at breakneck speed.
Let's not change the subject.
We're talking about David J. Duncan's claim that Bush/the Republicans is pushing some religion of jingoism. And what he has quoted from Bush simply does not substantiate that.
I'm not terribly surprised that you, like Mr. Duncan, find it difficult to grasp the difference between the existance of lawyers in DC, Republicans in office, [insert your most hated policy here], and the IDEAL of America.