Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I believe Chucky has finally lost it. He says he's opposed to gay marriage, but all of a sudden he wants to make it part of a litmus test for a Supreme Court nominee. Pssst! Hey Chucky! The Democrats are pro-gay marriage! Didn't you get the memo?

Sounds like Chucky saw a camera and a microphone and felt like he just had to open his pie-hole.


30 posted on 07/05/2005 1:40:22 PM PDT by billnaz (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: billnaz

A judicial candidate cannot sit before these pompous asses and give his opinion on any of it. He/She will be expected to rule by law impartially. The elitists trying to corner the candidates on beliefs and thoughts could disqualify him from certain cases in the future. There are plenty of ways to conduct a respectful intelligent hearing for any person
named by the President of the United States. The slanderous jihadists need a lesson in manners and obligations to the citizens of America. Grandstanding will be done by the political egotists needing to read about themselves in the media. It is a sickness.


44 posted on 07/05/2005 1:58:36 PM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson