Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mbraynard
Actually, he is corrected in a manner of speaking. No one is entitled to confidentiality, but those circumstances you mentioned are established by statute. In other words, the law has granted confidentiality in those cases, as they are recognized by tradition and practice as important considerations. Not trying to play with words here, but journalists are not protected by statute or tradition. Without the statues and case law that establishes this confidentiality, neither would husbands-wives or lawyers-clients be...
12 posted on 07/05/2005 11:28:24 AM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Still teaching... or a reasonable facsimile thereof...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
Not trying to play with words here, but journalists are not protected by statute or tradition.

They are protected by statute in 31 states and the District of Colombia. But not under federal law.

152 posted on 07/05/2005 3:22:30 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson