----Being thin and small will be a plus in hell - she'll handle the heat better.----
I can't wait until somebody uses "eminent domain" to build a McDonald's on top of her gravesite.
-Dan
Posted on 07/04/2005 9:20:24 PM PDT by GOPGuide
"Being thin and small will be a plus in hell - she'll handle the heat better."
Oh, I hope not. Thin and crispy never appealed to me. Plus I never assumed that hell had flames. Maybe it's exposure to Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey, but it gives me pleasure to imagine each person has specially tailored punishments. For people like Ginsburg, I imagine being forced to speak her oath to defend the Constitution over and over again would be enough.
It going be veryyyyy interestng Fall or Summer this year
Counting our chickens before they are hatched, ey? Having gotten gains so many terms in a row, it may come as a suprise but we can lose seats in 2006. This is especially true if the war doesnt show improvement and the GOP gets bad press for overreaching on SCOTUS debate.
Bush does not seem to share the love for Ms Brown that we do.
Bush needs to appoint Luttig, Roberts and Jones. In that order.
I believe the LORD is at work here!!
Janice Rogers Brown
Michael J. Luttig
Senator John Cornyn of Texas
All true, but keep in mind that the MORE conservative our Senate, the more conservative our SCOTUS appointees can be, so there is some small logic in delaying *some* SCOTUS nominations (not for O'Connor or Rehnquist's replacements, of course) until after the GOP adds 3 more net Senate seats in 2006 (because Dems have been fighting President Bush, the Iraq War, Tom DeLay, lower Court appointments, and now SCOTUS appointments...rather than concentrating on their vulnerable Senate seats in 2006 - meaning that they will suffer and lose in the races that count in the following November).
I can't wait until somebody uses "eminent domain" to build a McDonald's on top of her gravesite.
-Dan
That old goat Ginsburg will NEVER resign no matter how sick she is. Avowed Leftist that she is, she would consider it her duty to die on the job. tht way maybe she can squeeze one more "destroy America" vote in.
I guess you missed how the Dems sliced and diced John Ashcroft when he was up for AG Huh?
The Dems would turn on their own mother just to keep a conservative off the court
To: Drammach
"I prefer someone (anyone) with an established record of conservative, constitutional decisions.. "
I will not be surprised to see the name of Sen. John Cornyn mentioned here, although I would prefer to see him run for president in 08. But he might be 100 times more valuable on SCOTUS.
23 posted on 07/04/2005 10:40:45 PM CDT by de Buillion (Abortion kills more Democrats than Republicans, More Liberals than Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
I posted this a while back on another thread. "Supreme tort reccommends Janice Rogers Brown....................."
Keep in mind that most clueless people on both the far Left and far Right have no *idea* why the Bush's have been buddy-buddy friendly with the Clinton's (i.e. the people who put Ginsberg on the SCOTUS in the first place)...
I have similar beliefs. I believe she'll join Blackman and others in a room where she will listen, for all eternity, to 40 million plus babies scream as they are being suctioned apart.
Well, I guess the lefties in the Senate won't demand she be replaced by a "moderate" O'Conner clone.
You can't get any more extreme than the ACLU.
A 6-3 conservative court? The libs would be driving off bridges.
Maybe she's sick at the thought of losing her home to eminent domain.
Maybe she's sick at the thought of losing her home to eminent domain.
LOL! Sounds just like Democrat VOTERS!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.