Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DumpsterDiver
While acknowledging it might be "unfair for [Barnaby] to suffer the stigmatization of being labeled a sex offender when his crime was not sexually motivated," the court said his actions are the type that are "often a precursor" to a child being abducted or molested.

When you lump sex offenders into an overly broad category (peeing in public, grabbing a child by the arm, all the way to serial predators who rape and kill children)you make it more difficult to manage the situation.

20 posted on 07/04/2005 10:50:42 AM PDT by oldbrowser (You lost the election.....get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: oldbrowser

Agreed, that's what I was saying on another thread about sex crimes a few days ago. It makes it hard to get the real sex criminals punished as they need to be when taking a whiz in the park is considered a sex crime these days. Clean up the list, make sure only real offenders get on it, then deal with them harshly. What this guy did might not have been too bright in today's sue-happy, pc world, but it sure as hell wasn't a sex crime!


40 posted on 07/04/2005 11:42:47 AM PDT by Fire_on_High (I am so proud of what we were...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson