To: hole_n_one
Bingo, Bango, Bongo, and Irving.
100 posted on
07/03/2005 7:43:18 PM PDT by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: BradyLS
Bingo, Bango, Bongo, and Irving.You're my hero!
To: All
I made the following post yesterday and it got one response, not a good one at that. Can I impose upon you:
Actually, my choice for the SCOTUS would be Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY). Now, now, before you spray the beverage of your choice through your nose and onto your screen or tangle your fingers in haste to respond to my recommendation, hear me out:
1. MOVEONpac.org, already has commercials claiming President Bush will be choosing an extreme candidate for the court. This is in their Schaivo commercial, it would provide some serious egg on their collective faces.
2. The Democrats would have to sit on their hands and let her pass, while the Republicans would be forced to put her feet to the fire and actually earn their partisan pay. When she is voted down, the Democrats will be forced into a position of NOT being able to filibuster an ultra-conservative follow-up nominee.
3. The vetting and hearing process for SCOTUS nominee Clinton would make her damage goods for her Senate campaign and presidential campaign. It would be a hat trick if it caused her to resign her Senate seat.
I call it Win/Win/Win.
108 posted on
07/03/2005 7:48:07 PM PDT by
olde north church
(Why shop with the Son when the Father's place is still open for business?)
To: BradyLS
Bingo, Bango, Bongo, and IrvingWow! OK now what show was that from?
120 posted on
07/03/2005 7:54:19 PM PDT by
Fudd Fan
(fiat voluntas Tua)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson