To: dbluvsdjarrett; Always A Marine
They had a blood trail from the place the homicides happened to Simpson's bathroom. From the scene, to his vehicle, from the vehicle, into the house and all the way to his bathroom.
The Simpson case was nothing more than jury nullification. Which does not happen too often but it happens. The only people that were "THAT stupid" were on the jury.
66 posted on
07/04/2005 11:02:39 AM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(Get all the incumbents out of politics!)
To: isthisnickcool
Yet on the civil jury -- given that is the system here -- I would have found against OJ, that he was liable for the murder as to civil damages. The standard of proff is lower, and the proof against him easily met that standard.
69 posted on
07/04/2005 11:25:23 AM PDT by
bvw
To: isthisnickcool
Exactly. And just wondering if OJ is lurking on this thread. The issue with Fuhrman in the OJ case had nothing to do with the evidence against OJ or his investigation of the case.
Anyway, Fuhrman ended up a winner as a result of the OJ trial, with lucrative book contracts. It was mentioned on radio that he has a contract for another book, seemed it was a murder in the 1960s that remained unsolved until now. (I only caught the tail end and am not sure of the details.)
76 posted on
07/04/2005 1:40:32 PM PDT by
Dante3
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson