Of course you are right and I am wrong, police officers would never lie to get a conviction. They are as innocent as babes. Furman is a saint and a legal genious he quit the LAPD because he was just too smart to work there any longer and wanted a career writing books. Yeah and dont forget the moon is made of green cheese.
You said that many times police commit perjury to obtain convictions. Keep on the subject bud. That's what I'm talking about and in that regard I am right and you are wrong. Now you sarcastically say police officers would never lie to get a conviction which is turning around your original words. You go on to make other "points" I never made. Which is a typical tactic when you have no arguments or facts to back up the original things you said which you just pulled out of thin air. I invite you to submit proof that "many times" police commit purjury to get convictions.
Like I said, for your statements to be true you would have to have DA investigators and prosecutors involved in helping the police convict innocent people. And even judges. So? Are all these people involved?
As far as Fuhrman? Like I said he was and is a good detective. He made a mistake and paid for it. I never said he was a saint or "a legal genius (sic)".
Did you pay for something too? Is that what this is all about? Have a little problem with the law yourself in the past? And that's what is really your problem here?