Replies

Luskin claimed that the prosecutor “asked us not to talk about what Karl has had to say.” This is highly unlikely. Prosecutors have absolutely no control over what witnesses say when they leave the grand jury room.

Uh, the key word is "asked" - - the prosecutor "asked". Rove decided to comply.

Rove can tell us word-for-word what he said to the grand jury and would if he thought it would help him.

Yes, he could. But then, that would tip off your allies on how to lie.

And notice that Luskin just did reveal part of Rove’s grand jury testimony, the fact that he had a conversation with Cooper. Rove would not let me get one day of traction on this story if he could stop me.

No, Rove would never want you to dig your grave deeper.... HAR!!

If what I have reported is not true, if Karl Rove is not Matt Cooper’s source, Rove could prove that instantly by telling us what he told the grand jury.

LOL, Larry, there you go again, begging to know what Karl told the grand jury! (See above.) Won't happen - - your allies will be forced to tell the truth or risk perjury charges. Oh, crap! HAR!!!

"Larry, there you go again, begging to know what Karl told the grand jury!"

Larry's awfully worried about something, isn't he?

Rove isn't stupid. Liberals are. And the idiot Leftists aren't going to find out anything until *everyone* knows the score.