Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
Rather, Rove insisted, he had only circulated information about Plame after it had appeared in Novak's column.

This may be true, and will form the crux of the Dim's attack on Rove. It will come out that Rove discussed with Time Magazine about Plame being with the CIA, the impication being that Rove is the leaker.

It will be quite a dance for the White House to explain the subtlety that the leak was to Novak, and that Rove was just confirming what was already public knowledge at the time.

69 posted on 07/03/2005 3:48:21 PM PDT by Toskrin (All it takes to be a good person is some emotion and a little self-praise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Toskrin

Except we knew this over a year ago. Nobody's fooled, it's very plain Rove didn't "leak Plame's name" and this didn't gain traction, as O'Donnell himself has whined this morning.

This 3rd attempt to link the story to Rove has failed....again.


74 posted on 07/03/2005 4:09:39 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson