Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: summer

This is just so much BS. Lawrence O'D has no way to legally know what goes on in the grand jury duty room. If someone is leaking grand jury testimony to him then they are liable! (but then someone would have to contest that info and that's hard to do under the gag rules.)

I find it laughable that it would even be suggested that a new inquiry would spring from an ongoing jury. It just doesn't work that way.


65 posted on 07/03/2005 3:31:50 PM PDT by debg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: debg

correction to my last post: "but then someone would have to contest that info IN THE MEDIA and that's hard to do under the gag rules."


66 posted on 07/03/2005 3:36:14 PM PDT by debg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson