Michael would be an AWESOME CHOICE!!!!
To: ConservativeMan55
2 posted on
07/02/2005 5:37:41 PM PDT by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: ConservativeMan55
The last thing the Supreme Court needs is another Lawyer..
Its time for some reality in that place.. its the rare lawyer with any sense..
8 posted on
07/02/2005 5:45:19 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been ok'ed me to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: ConservativeMan55
The more I see and read about this man, the more I want him on the Supreme Court.
12 posted on
07/02/2005 5:47:50 PM PDT by
Jenya
(Terrorism. Bush gets it.)
To: ConservativeMan55
In addition to his conservative credentials, I like the fact Luttig is only 51.
To: ConservativeMan55
plus, he's only 51 so he might be there 30 years!
20 posted on
07/02/2005 6:00:58 PM PDT by
votelife
(we need 60 conservative senators)
To: ConservativeMan55
He helped bring down Anita Hill? You know the fully segregated, step-n-fetchit, colored only Congressional Black Caucus will oppose him for that reason, alone. And, if the CBC opposes him, the Senate dems will weigh their words heavily. On the other hand, the Senate dems may ignore the vlacks as they always do, knowing they'll get 90+% of the black vote no matter what.
24 posted on
07/02/2005 6:05:59 PM PDT by
Tacis
("Democrats - The Party of Traitors, Treachery and Treason!")
To: ConservativeMan55
Any negative/controversial press on him? Would he have a chance of getting through?
33 posted on
07/02/2005 6:35:34 PM PDT by
Jenya
(Terrorism. Bush gets it.)
To: ConservativeMan55
Good job. Thanks for the ping.
36 posted on
07/02/2005 6:41:28 PM PDT by
nwrep
To: ConservativeMan55
I like that he has good credentials, a good outlook, and is only 51.
51 posted on
07/02/2005 7:01:23 PM PDT by
HitmanLV
To: ConservativeMan55
To: ConservativeMan55
Wait...wait. LET'S NOT get the cart before the HORSE. First we have to go ASK Senator Ted Kennedy if we have his permission to promote this as an option.
To: All
Well one thing for sure we know how he will stand on POS juvenile car jackers. Now if Kennedy, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer would hurry up and choke on their food we can clean out the prisons of some juvenile scum.
65 posted on
07/02/2005 7:09:29 PM PDT by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: ConservativeMan55
Michael Luttig would be an awesome choice. He is a brilliant legal mind. However, this may not be the right time to appoint him.
William Rehnquest will be stepping down before long. When that happens, the logical thing to do is elevate Antonin Scalia to Chief Justice and Luttig to succeed Scalia as Associate Justice. But with O'Conner retiring, someone with less of a paper trail would be a better choice, given the political realities.
To: All
Actually, my choice for the SCOTUS would be Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY). Now, now, before you spray the beverage of your choice through your nose and onto your screen or tangle your fingers in haste to respond to my recommendation, hear me out:
1. MOVEONpac.org, already has commercials claiming President Bush will be choosing an extreme candidate for the court. This is in their Schaivo commercial, it would provide some serious egg on their collective faces.
2. The Democrats would have to sit on their hands and let her pass, while the Republicans would be forced to put her feet to the fire and actually earn their partisan pay. When she is voted down, the Democrats will be forced into a position of NOT being able to filibuster an ultra-conservative follow-up nominee.
3. The vetting and hearing process for SCOTUS nominee Clinton would make her damage goods for her Senate campaign and presidential campaign. It would be a hat trick if it caused her to resign her Senate seat.
I call it Win/Win/Win.
113 posted on
07/02/2005 9:49:52 PM PDT by
olde north church
(Why shop with the Son when the Father's place is still open for business?)
To: ConservativeMan55
Are Luttigs grandparents still alive and reasonably sharp?
If not, keep looking!
114 posted on
07/02/2005 9:56:56 PM PDT by
proudpapa
(of three.)
To: ConservativeMan55
To: ConservativeMan55
nah. Too white and too male. As much as I love Dubya he will predictably pick a minority for this slot - most likely hispanic. Not saying its right and Michael would be a great choice. But I give up on these deals and just bend over and say thanks, may I please have another.
To: ConservativeMan55
Luttig, Jones, Brown. All three are originalists, if I have gathered my facts correctly.
Luttig seems to be the best "scholar", again, if I have gathered my facts correctly.
Any of the three would be fine with me.
If it is Mel Martinez or some other liberal, we need to march on Washington and shut the place down.
138 posted on
09/09/2005 6:09:08 PM PDT by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: ConservativeMan55
Luttig, Jones, Brown. All three are originalists, if I have gathered my facts correctly.
Luttig seems to be the best "scholar", again, if I have gathered my facts correctly.
Any of the three would be fine with me.
If it is Mel Martinez or some other liberal, we need to march on Washington and shut the place down.
139 posted on
09/09/2005 6:09:11 PM PDT by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: ConservativeMan55
Luttig, Jones, Brown. All three are originalists, if I have gathered my facts correctly.
Luttig seems to be the best "scholar", again, if I have gathered my facts correctly.
Any of the three would be fine with me.
If it is Mel Martinez or some other liberal, we need to march on Washington and shut the place down.
140 posted on
09/09/2005 6:09:13 PM PDT by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
