Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CHARLITE
In those grand jury proceedings, Woodward writes,
Pottinger quietly reminded Felt that he was under oath. He
then offered to withdraw the question as irrelevant to the
subject of investigation, which was illegal break-ins
conducted by the FBI in pursuit of antiwar radicals from
the Weather Underground. Pottinger told Woodward, who
didn't confirm his conclusion, that he would keep it to
himself.

"To his eternal credit," Woodward writes, he did just
that.


Pottinger was acting in collusion with Woodward?
2 posted on 07/02/2005 12:18:21 AM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DaveTesla
Seems like collusion of a kind. Watergate reporting smells. We have an agent of the U.S. gov't, an FBI wheel, put in charge of located Deep Throat who was in fact (supposedly) Deep Throat. He clearly violated law and ethics to feed his friend information. He clearly had a personal agenda. Imagine if he'd been revealed as the source in a scandal today. We'd know his agenda, his position and so forth. Something the public *should've* been able to evaluate back then. Lord knows if Dick Nixon had been a Dem, the Post would've spiked the story as its sister-publication Newsweek did to the Clinton/Monica story. The Clinton machine destroyed good people, people trying to do the right thing and got away with it. Totally the opposite of Watergate. Clinton had lied under oath! No question about it. As an officer of the court, even. And still the media machine ensured the public didn't care by allowing Starr to be demonized, Trip to be demonized, etc.

We didn't even have that much on Nixon's involvement.

What, in truth, was the 'horror' of Watergate? It was a second-rate burglary after all without the slam-dunk proof of the Clinton high crimes and misdemeanors.

The contrast between the treatment of Watergate and Monica figures is staggering.

What EVIL compels the Democrats to destroy, destroy, destroy? They took out Nixon and tried to avoid confirming Ford in order to stage a coup. They went after Reagan/Bush on Iran/Contra. They threatened impeachment if Bush 41 went to Baghdad thus we left the Iraqi people hanging and slaughtered by Saddam's death squads. They've threatened impeachment of W since before he was sworn in and they're pushing this questionable memo as a basis. It's a SICKNESS.

I'll never forgive the Bush administration for not investigating Felt/Deep Throat for violations of law. It's just one more blight on their mediocre record along with the wide-open borders. Just because you blow the wistle, doesn't mean you can do it through illegal means. Someone needs to ask Linda Trip about that.

6 posted on 07/02/2005 3:10:36 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Remind Liberal Cowards Why America Freed Iraq: http://massgraves.info/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson