Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fatima

Because it would not be sustained, if the names other than the names I mentioned are nominated, or the Nuke option would pop up. Smart conservative nominees respected for their mind and temperment who do not seem like loose cannons, are not going to be bounced in that way. That is my guess. I could be wrong.


9 posted on 07/01/2005 7:54:56 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Torie

Brown or Luttig.


12 posted on 07/01/2005 8:02:47 PM PDT by fatima (Make a move and the Bunny gets it.-Guess what movie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Torie

Ignore the odds for a moment and speculate what affect a
Brown nomination would have on the Court. I think it would release Thomas from his self-imposed embattlement. With, say, Scalia heading the court and young turks Brown and Thomas, both battle scarred and not in the least beholden to to their detractors, I think you would see a flowering of
intellectual conservative jurisprudence. I have read what I could of their opinions and, separately, they are solid and cautious. Together, I see an entirely different dynamic.


46 posted on 07/02/2005 1:32:58 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson