Skip to comments.
WILL THE FILIBUSTER COMPROMISE HOLD?? WITH O'CONNOR RETIRING, DON'T BET ON IT!!!
vanity ^
| 07-01-05
| cww
Posted on 07/01/2005 8:04:23 AM PDT by CWW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Your comments and prognastications?
1
posted on
07/01/2005 8:04:25 AM PDT
by
CWW
To: CWW
LET'S GET READY TO RRRRRUMBLLLLLLLLE!!!!
Oh wait, I already said that.
2
posted on
07/01/2005 8:05:06 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(Dems: "It can't be done" Reps. "Move, we'll find a way or make a way. It has to be done!")
To: CWW
We need some "spine " in the senate. A conservative in the White House(I do like GWB,but he is not a conservative)and numerated rights at the Supreme Court.The good news is there are 25 conservatives in the house.
3
posted on
07/01/2005 8:06:46 AM PDT
by
Gipper08
(Mike Pence in 2008)
To: CWW
I believe that all bets are off. Demons will filisbuter any apointment from Bush.
4
posted on
07/01/2005 8:06:53 AM PDT
by
Strutt9
To: CWW
Dealing with democrats is like dealing with terrorists. If thier lips are moving they're lying.
5
posted on
07/01/2005 8:07:39 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: CWW
You KNOW the Demonrats Lied when they said they would not obsrtuct nominees. They left themselves an out they will use it and abuse it... Much blood on the horizon....
6
posted on
07/01/2005 8:07:45 AM PDT
by
SouthernBoyupNorth
("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
To: CWW
7
posted on
07/01/2005 8:09:08 AM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN - 3rd Bn. Fifth Marines RVN 1969)
To: Tenacious 1
8
posted on
07/01/2005 8:09:57 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
To: CWW
It is going to get nasty in D.C. If the President nominates a conservative, there will be a battle in Congress that will make the Bolton mess look like child's play.
The Democrats are like a frightened, cornered dog. They are going to go all out on this one.
Look for filibuster mania.
9
posted on
07/01/2005 8:10:08 AM PDT
by
SaveTheChief
(There are 10 types of people -- those who understand binary, and those who don't.)
To: CWW
I see you logged on long enough for me to say hi.
Hi.
10
posted on
07/01/2005 8:10:18 AM PDT
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(You can turn your head away from the Berg video and still hear Al Queda's calls to prayer.)
To: Tenacious 1
Tragic but historically funny, a joke for all of time.....
Bush should nominate Ted Kennedy to the supreme court. Just imagine. What would the Dems do?
11
posted on
07/01/2005 8:10:38 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(Dems: "It can't be done" Reps. "Move, we'll find a way or make a way. It has to be done!")
To: CWW
For dems, too much of their liberal orthodoxy is tied up in the Court.Make that ALL of their liberal orthodoxy is tied up int he courts.
Small correction. O'Connor was in the minority on the eminent domain case. Replacing her with a conservative would still yield 5-4 against property rights.
12
posted on
07/01/2005 8:11:16 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: CWW
President Bush has always said that he would appoint strict constructionists.
President Bush doesn't lie. You can take the nomination of a strict constructionist to the bank
13
posted on
07/01/2005 8:11:31 AM PDT
by
bayourod
(Unless we get 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
To: CWW
I predict that the unprincipled, lying, cheaters, will continue to lie, cheat, and be unprincipled.
NEWS ALERT!!!!!
14
posted on
07/01/2005 8:11:53 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Honor the fallen and the heroes of 9/11 at the Memorial Site.)
To: CWW
We need another Justice Thomas!
15
posted on
07/01/2005 8:12:03 AM PDT
by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: CWW
And another bet.
Bush will not get a SC judge to that bench before his term in office expires.
Unless of course, it's someone the democrats pick for him.
16
posted on
07/01/2005 8:13:20 AM PDT
by
Logic n' Reason
(Don't piss down my back and tell me it's rainin')
To: Blood of Tyrants
You are correct. Kennedy was the turncoat on the Kuhl case.
17
posted on
07/01/2005 8:14:07 AM PDT
by
CWW
(Mark Sanford for President on 2008!)
To: CWW
Eminent Domain.
The eminent domain decision I believe will become part of this fight for the court.
Specifically, justices from which wing voted for it again?
If the RNC can run a successful ad campaign (one thing they are good at) portraying Democrats as the friends of home grabbing justices.
I personally think O'Connor was resigning all along and I think everyone on the inside knew it, so they fed the rumor to the press in order to well, distract them.
18
posted on
07/01/2005 8:14:29 AM PDT
by
AzaleaCity5691
(The enemy lies in the heart of Gadsden)
To: SouthernBoyupNorth
Goodbye!
19
posted on
07/01/2005 8:14:45 AM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
To: CWW
Nominate Ann Coulter to the Court!
Class, beauty and a great legal mind with uncompromising principles!
20
posted on
07/01/2005 8:15:05 AM PDT
by
Prost1
(New AG, Berger is still free, copped a plea! I still get my news from FR!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
