Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Coverage -- (July '05)
Thomas ^ | 7-1-05 | US Congress

Posted on 07/01/2005 6:12:26 AM PDT by OXENinFLA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,701-1,7201,721-1,7401,741-1,760 ... 1,781-1,785 next last
To: defconw
I don't know if he caved....

See the post above. It looks like it was by agreement, but I don't like it. The dems will pull out every delaying tactic they can think of.

1,721 posted on 07/29/2005 10:35:38 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1720 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
I don't like it either. But what's done is done. I say come in with the Constitutional Option and get it over with! I love how the dems are always talking about the children, but they only care about the ones who can by the grace of God leave the womb! Unbelievable!
1,722 posted on 07/29/2005 10:38:31 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1721 | View Replies]

To: defconw
Do you know what exactly a Legislative Branch Spending Bill Conference Report even is? I don't. I am sorry to say.

Not really

1,723 posted on 07/29/2005 10:39:46 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1712 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
"Republicans had threatened to start the hearings on August 29, interrupting the Senate's scheduled monthlong summer recess. But GOP senators decided they would have enough time to get Roberts through the Judiciary Committee, and past a full vote on the Senate floor, before the court starts its new term Oct. 3."

Yea, Yea .. I heard that same line with the Bolton hearings

1,724 posted on 07/29/2005 10:41:32 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1719 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I'll believe them When Judge Roberts appears in the class picture.


1,725 posted on 07/29/2005 10:46:19 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1724 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Reed interrupting Sessions for a question

it threw Jeff off

Is this allowed in Senate Rules?


1,726 posted on 07/29/2005 10:50:38 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1725 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Yes Jeff did not have to yield for the question, he could have just refused to yield and Reed would have had to shut up.


1,727 posted on 07/29/2005 10:53:33 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1726 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I know what you mean.

"before the court starts its new term Oct. 3."

2006 or 2007?


1,728 posted on 07/29/2005 11:00:30 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1724 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

I really wish the Repubs would have objected to putting all these amendments on S397!


1,729 posted on 07/29/2005 11:26:56 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1728 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

You should see how many they rejected! We'd be here another month.


1,730 posted on 07/29/2005 11:29:20 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1729 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

Looks like the dems won again...

The REPS were wanting it started in August--thanks again Frist, and Specter...


1,731 posted on 07/29/2005 11:31:24 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Germaine Broussard, "The Cookie Lady", deserves a medal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1714 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Imagine Pat Roberts' daughter, she's probably having kittens about now.


1,732 posted on 07/29/2005 11:31:29 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1729 | View Replies]

To: defconw

I was driving home from my daughter's house, and the ABC Radio News had a soundbite from Tom Delay, and he is NOT happy about what Frist did today, at ALL...


1,733 posted on 07/29/2005 11:33:53 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Germaine Broussard, "The Cookie Lady", deserves a medal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1730 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Well it's only a week, maybe they have enough votes, only the Three Stooges and the Ugly Step Sister have expressed negative views of Judge Roberts.


1,734 posted on 07/29/2005 11:34:39 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1731 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Forgot to ask...did anything exciting happen while I was gone?

Both Laura Ingraham and Glenn Beck BOTH were surprised and disappointed with Frist's statement today, also.


1,735 posted on 07/29/2005 11:36:40 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Germaine Broussard, "The Cookie Lady", deserves a medal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

They voted on The legislative conference the energy conference and highway conference all three passed. Craig's amendment passed, I think that's it. It's been coma time mostly. I turned Rush off because I can't stand it when he is not there, I am sure Hannity will be fired up.


1,736 posted on 07/29/2005 11:39:38 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1735 | View Replies]

To: All

UP NOW....


SA 1615. Mr. KENNEDY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 397, to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

On page 13, after line 4, insert the following:

SEC. 5. ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION.

(a) EXPANSION OF DEFINITION OF ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION.--Section 921(a)(17)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(1) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at the end;

(2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

``(iii) a projectile that may be used in a handgun and that the Attorney General determines, under section 926(d), to be capable of penetrating body armor; or

``(iv) a projectile for a center-fire rifle, designed or marketed as having armor piercing capability, that the Attorney General determines, under section 926(d), to be more likely to penetrate body armor than standard ammunition of the same caliber.''.

(b) DETERMINATION OF THE CAPABILITY OF PROJECTILES TO PENETRATE BODY ARMOR.--Section 926 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

``(d)(1) Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Attorney General shall promulgate standards for the uniform testing of projectiles against Body Armor Exemplar.

``(2) The standards promulgated under paragraph (1) shall take into account, among other factors, variations in performance that are related to the length of the barrel of the handgun or center-fire rifle from which the projectile is fired and the amount and kind of powder used to propel the projectile.

``(3) As used in paragraph (1), the term `Body Armor Exemplar' means body armor that the Attorney General determines meets minimum standards for the protection of law enforcement officers.''.


1,737 posted on 07/29/2005 11:46:31 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1736 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Just switched to the House for a second, and some guy(R) was talking about ESC...and how the Federal Govt. SHOULD pay for it...blech

They have just recessed until Tues, Sept. 6 th.


1,738 posted on 07/29/2005 11:46:49 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Germaine Broussard, "The Cookie Lady", deserves a medal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1736 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

Yep .. the pubbies need to get their act together and stop letting the Dems make fools of them


1,739 posted on 07/29/2005 11:47:18 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1728 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Kenndy up


1,740 posted on 07/29/2005 11:48:19 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,701-1,7201,721-1,7401,741-1,760 ... 1,781-1,785 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson