Skip to comments.
U.S. Won't Cede Control of Net Computers
yahoo
Posted on 07/01/2005 6:07:22 AM PDT by janetjanet998
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: janetjanet998
You mean we're not just going to hand over all control to the U.N.? Wow, this is a pleasant surprise!
2
posted on
07/01/2005 6:09:10 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
To: janetjanet998
Is there any doubt who would be immediately given power over these computers should Hitlery become our next president?
3
posted on
07/01/2005 6:10:36 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: janetjanet998
To: janetjanet998
This decision will annoy rest of the world. It might even result in fragmentation of internet. We'll see what happens...
5
posted on
07/01/2005 6:18:49 AM PDT
by
MirrorField
(Just an opinion from atheist, minarchist and small-l libertarian.)
To: janetjanet998
Good. At least some people still have balls here.
6
posted on
07/01/2005 6:19:44 AM PDT
by
RedBeaconNY
(Peace is not absence of war.)
To: janetjanet998
What? Countries like France or China might break-off the internet? An internet only for the U.S and it's allies? What a tragedy!
7
posted on
07/01/2005 6:19:57 AM PDT
by
Yak
To: janetjanet998
In a worst-case scenario, countries refusing to accept U.S. control could establish their own separate Domain Name System and thus fracture the Internet into more than one network. That means two users typing the same domain name could reach entirely different Web sites, depending on where they are. Reliance on a single conceptual root is just a convention (though a better one than the old days where people ftp'd in the latest hosts.txt) in using the DNS protocol.
There's nothing that I find particularly worrisome about groups setting up alternate root servers serving alternate roots.
To: janetjanet998
Notice they can't just say 'No' and 'Yes'. They say, 'Yes, I believe 2 caring people should be allowed to get married' or something like unto it, an 'no'. Casting us as coldhearted cruel people with no compassion. Just a point of interest...
9
posted on
07/01/2005 6:22:05 AM PDT
by
RedBeaconNY
(Peace is not absence of war.)
To: RedBeaconNY
10
posted on
07/01/2005 6:22:38 AM PDT
by
RedBeaconNY
(Peace is not absence of war.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Is there any doubt who would be immediately given power over these computers should Hitlery become our next president? The president can do this without Congress?
11
posted on
07/01/2005 6:24:01 AM PDT
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: janetjanet998
ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US!
12
posted on
07/01/2005 6:24:31 AM PDT
by
gura
To: MirrorField
Fragmentation ? Well, the French have 300 kinds of stinky cheese. Africans have their drums...
To: janetjanet998
We invented the Internet! We use the Internet! It is ours! Nobody else will lay his clammy hands on it!
To: janetjanet998
If they don't like it, they can build their own damn internet!
To: janetjanet998
The USA is probably footing all the bill, so we should be the ones that call the shots.
16
posted on
07/01/2005 6:44:42 AM PDT
by
caver
(Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
We invented the Internet! We use the Internet! It is ours! Nobody else will lay his clammy hands on it!Thank you Al Gore for inventing the internet!!!!!!!!!!!!!
17
posted on
07/01/2005 6:48:47 AM PDT
by
phil1750
(Love like you've never been hurt;Dance like nobody's watching;PRAY like it's your last prayer)
To: William Terrell
"Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kinda cool." - WJ Clinton
18
posted on
07/01/2005 7:09:19 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
"Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kinda cool." - WJ Clinton Having to do with executive orders. Ratification of treaties with foreign powers requires congressional action. My understanding is that any present treaties we have with the UN and our membership therein can't be stretched to cover ceding new areas of sovereignty. Like the other treaties we have with that organization, a new one would have to be ratified.
19
posted on
07/01/2005 8:24:08 AM PDT
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson