Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I wonder how many of you Freepers think that this could mean that the notes in question, which they are disclosing, reveal a Republican or a member of the Bush Adminitration?
1 posted on 07/01/2005 4:06:29 AM PDT by RetSignman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RetSignman
Mandy Grunwald's husband.

Anyone think they'll be the real notes?

2 posted on 07/01/2005 4:10:19 AM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman
Of course the notes reflect poorly (imply deceit) for the Bush admin.

Else the Times would be refusing.

(When the Clinton admin was lying about Lee involvement with their DOE, the reporters are still withholding evidence.)
3 posted on 07/01/2005 4:17:23 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman
Material from the New York Times needs to be excerpted because of copyright restrictions.

Updated FR Excerpt and Link Only or Deny Posting List due to Copyright Complaints

4 posted on 07/01/2005 4:36:02 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman
Material from the New York Times needs to be excerpted because of copyright restrictions.

Updated FR Excerpt and Link Only or Deny Posting List due to Copyright Complaints

5 posted on 07/01/2005 4:36:04 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman
Quite ironic, isn't it?

This cover is from October, 2003.


9 posted on 07/01/2005 4:46:48 AM PDT by SkyPilot (Eliminate, eradicate, and stamp out redundancy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman

OK folks, you heard it here first:

My prediction?

The notes that get turned over will be CBS-style "fake but accurate" fabrications that point the finger at noneother than Karl Rove.

The leftists in our media want to get that guy more than anybody else in the Bush Administration.


11 posted on 07/01/2005 4:55:39 AM PDT by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman
Who "exposed" non-field operator Valerie Plame is much less important than who tipped off an Islamonazi fake charity to an impending raid.

I believe what the prosecutor is really looking for here is who leaked THAT information to journalists and that just maybe the Plame leaker is the same as the raid leaker.

At least when--or IF--the prosecutor gets that name or names, he can put pressure on the leaker regarding the important case of the blown raid.

I agree with expectations here that Grunewald's husband is very likely to give the prosecutor false name(s). My money is also on Grunewald's husband as the tipoff man. I doubt very much that Miller would do that.

My hope is that the prosecutor will now be able to get phone records so that he can track down the real source(s) even if Grunewald's husband lies to him and produces notes from the Rather Forgery Team so to speak.

19 posted on 07/01/2005 5:27:11 AM PDT by Sal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson