I believe? your intention is to correlate the fact she is a racist to the comment about the NYT's that I made? If so, you miss the mark.
I didn't state one word about the character of the woman. The difference between the NYT's and Donna, is that Donna recognizes as a political strategist that this is about more than whether conservative "whites" will vote for "blacks".
Donna is one of the few that was not dismissive of the 2004 GOP gains in swing states. The only states where a new campaign strategy reaching through churches and black radio etc..succeeded in nearly doubling the percentage we had in 2000. Donna is cognizant that there has been a shift in the attitude of the Republican Party outreach to the black community, largely due to the President's wishes. She is aware of the top qualified minority candidates being recruited for high elective office in crucial states. she is aware of the discontent of the black community rising as they witness the GOP outreach, and continue to be taken for granted by the Democrats that socially and on school vouchers are completely out of step.
Say as you will about her character, that isn't important. That someone with her head in the game views a threat coming from the Republican party politically, it says more than anything I ever could.
[[ believe? your intention is to correlate the fact she is a racist to the comment about the NYT's that I made? If so, you miss the mark. I didn't state one word about the character of the woman.]]
As a racist she has no credibility about ANYTHING, not even elections.