Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eastbound

If we are nuked first, then it will be time to clean out the arsenals and scorch the earth wherever it needs scorching



IMHO, we were nuked first. Actually we were nuked twice. Both in the same place.

-WTC 1993, by the grace of God, the building didn't go down immediately and kill tens of thousands.

-WTC 2001, the destruction was equal to a suitcase nuke at least.

Waiting to be nuked again, would be suicidal to this country. It could come from a shipping container, a truck coming across our unguarded border and do you think, in our present PC mentality, we would strike back against some country without "proof" that country was "involved".


No we can not wait to be nuked.


50 posted on 07/01/2005 1:40:52 AM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: TomasUSMC
"Waiting to be nuked again, would be suicidal to this country. It could come from a shipping container, a truck coming across our unguarded border and do you think, in our present PC mentality, we would strike back against some country without "proof" that country was "involved"."

What a dilemma. I've been up half the night thinking about this and still haven't concluded anything.

But I think we would nuke any country that supports terrorism if we were nuked. Like Bush said, 'if you're not with us, you are against us,' or words to that effect. The public would demand it. If the muzzie countries knew and believed this would happen, indiscriminately, they would be busting a$$ to make sure it didn't happen.

On the other hand, I don't think they are all that civilized or care about the human race including themselves. Just look at the crap they have to put up with under the demands of Islam. Maybe that's what they are trying to escape from and what motivates them deep down.

As the months on this terrorism crap winds down, it would make no difference who struck first, for half the world would be unliveable. I would hope the muzzies would not want to go that way.

Re: Japan. They didn't have the capability to strike back and were quick to recognize their error. The muzzies don't have the brains to recognize error, so all the more reason to eliminate their capabilities -- whatever it took.

Let me extend that. If we knew without a doubt that they had the weaponry and delivery system, the rules would change quickly. If they could believe that we would not pre-empt, there would be no reason for them build the weapons.

If they go forward with their nuke program, that would change the equation the moment we found out about it. If we already know for sure they are building weapons, now is the time to take them out. Not tomorrow.

We had M.A.D. with Russia and it worked. But then, the Russians were civilized and they at least valued their own lives.

So you have a valid point. Take 'em out now if they even talk about building nukes.

But back to Square One again. Where do we start? Egypt? Iran? Regardless of where, you know the whole region is going to be barren of everything for a long time.

And the world will be changed overnight, for better or worse.

55 posted on 07/01/2005 4:01:37 AM PDT by Eastbound (Jacked out since 3/31/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson