Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: InShanghai; cpforlife.org; Coleus; Peach; Mr. Silverback; airborne; MHGinTN; hocndoc

bump & some pings


3 posted on 06/30/2005 8:20:20 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem; Coleus; MHGinTN

This is a very good response to Cuomo.

I had not read about Professor George's advocacy for OAR. And I had forgotten the distinction between the different types of non-embryonic, but sorta-embryonic, stem cells such as this one and those advocated by Dr. Hurlbut.

Like Dr. Hurlbut's proposed, genetically altered artifacts, OAR appears to be the production of stem cells that skips the totipotent embryonic stage - they never are a complete entity, organized and with the nature that can develop into an independent organism. Neither would ever make a placenta, for example. Hurlbut's would be similar to a teratoma, OAR would be similar to a less-organized cancerous tumor. Both need to be tried in animal models before human donors are used.


7 posted on 06/30/2005 10:05:58 PM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson