Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CU prof defends military remarks {Ward Churchill BARF alert)
Denver Post ^ | 6/30/05 | Jim Kirksey and Amy Herdy

Posted on 06/30/2005 1:44:01 PM PDT by freespirited

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
I'll post a link to the video. Decide for yourself if he meant it.
1 posted on 06/30/2005 1:44:03 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freespirited

He be toast....soon...


2 posted on 06/30/2005 1:45:04 PM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
"Conscientious objection removes a given piece of the cannon fodder from the fray," he said. "Fragging an officer has a much more impactful effect."

From a purely logical standpoint, the statement is absolutely accurate.

3 posted on 06/30/2005 1:46:42 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Controversial University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill

Should say lunatic Univerity of Colorado professor Ward Churchill.

4 posted on 06/30/2005 1:47:55 PM PDT by sydbas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

What a putz!

Wadd doesn't really mean much of anything he says... so why say anything at all, jerk?


5 posted on 06/30/2005 1:48:32 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited


Here is a link to the clip--sorry it's just the audio really, played on O'reilly last night. See if you believe he was just trying to get folks to think.

http://treyjackson.typepad.com/junction/2005/06/video_churchill.html


6 posted on 06/30/2005 1:48:59 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Isn't this maggot's "15 minutes" up yet?


7 posted on 06/30/2005 1:49:12 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
whats amazing is it will take over two years to Fire him...this tenure crap has to end...and government rules of employment have to get more private...like being able to fire him....its amazing that people defend him....he is ruining the university
8 posted on 06/30/2005 1:49:40 PM PDT by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

A soldier is much more than cannon fodder. A soldier who is a volunteer, is a person with ideals and a sense of purpose which reveals itself through the pulling of a trigger.


9 posted on 06/30/2005 1:49:51 PM PDT by mict42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
At this point, I'm starting to think that Churchill pleasures himself while thumbing through his extensive collection of photos of Eichmann.
10 posted on 06/30/2005 1:49:54 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
When one of the forum's attendees said that the impact such a fragging might have on the officer's family should be considered, Churchill replied, "How do you feel about Adolf Eichmann's family?"

I wonder why the focus isn't on this. He's clearly intimating that our officers are Eichmanns.
11 posted on 06/30/2005 1:51:17 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Two thoughts:

1. Why is he obsessed with Eichmann?

2. So telling people to think about fragging an officer is much more acceptable than telling them to do it?


12 posted on 06/30/2005 1:52:08 PM PDT by No Longer Free State (Has a college student ever fragged his anti-American professor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
He be toast....soon...

I doubt CU is ever going to fire him. If they were serious hey would of done it already. What I can figure the CU Committee is just stalling and hoping that everyone would forget about it. I don't believe Lib Intellectuals are willing to sacrifice their own. Especially if it someone that make themselves look sane.


13 posted on 06/30/2005 1:52:10 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Incorrect. An individual soldier can and often does deliver an impact on the battlefield which surpasses his own officer in effectiveness.

Additionally, the US Army has a flexible command structure - if an officer is incapacitated, chaos will rarely result.

There is a clear chain of command and every unit has multiple potential leaders.

Churchill's comment is neither logical nor even very good English.

14 posted on 06/30/2005 1:53:05 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
He be toast....soon...

I sincerely hope so, but one member of the CU's Board of Regents said it could take another two years. And, he could retire before then anyway.

15 posted on 06/30/2005 1:54:05 PM PDT by Dave Olson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sydbas

And CU wants to raise tuition by 20% next year. LOL! Good luck, silly Boulderites!


16 posted on 06/30/2005 1:54:44 PM PDT by Millee (So you're a feminist......isn't that cute??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Here is man openly advocating soldiers murdering their officers.... in a time of war. If that's not treason and sedition I don't know what is.
17 posted on 06/30/2005 1:56:38 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Colorado University deserves this guy. He's been on their payroll for years. Spewing hatred.

Between their alcohol deaths, their sports scandals, and this miscreant the school just hangs tough and earns the disgust of honorable patriotic citizens.

18 posted on 06/30/2005 1:59:23 PM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

I don't know about that. Soldiers are almost never directly led by officers, instead they are led by their NCOs who get the mission plan of their officers. Not having an officer around may have some effect, but not much. The senior NCOs will step up, take charge, and just wait until another officer is brought in for their marching orders.


19 posted on 06/30/2005 2:01:51 PM PDT by SamFromLivingston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I don't think that there is any branch of the US service that *doesn't* have a flexible command structure at this point. One of the lessons learned from WW2, Korea, and Vietnam.

Even if the enemy manages to kill the CO of a unit in battle or through skullduggery, unit effectiveness is hardly impaired with the structure we have today.


20 posted on 06/30/2005 2:02:25 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson