To: publiusF27
Puuhleeeeaaase
The amendment already exists, besides, WAY too many people will lose their homes and businesses before that idea would ever get off the ground.
Fight fire with fire.
138 posted on
06/30/2005 2:29:32 PM PDT by
BlueMondaySkipper
(The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell)
To: BlueMondaySkipper
Trying to put out a fire here, and keep the ammo boxes stored.
Suppose this works, and the town condemns Souter's property. What is the very worst thing that could happen next? They offer him a fair price, he says fine and takes it.
Next time one of these abusive cases comes along, and we all cry about property rights, the big government crowd can just say, "Hey, Souter didn't whine like a baby when it happened to him."
And by the way, the Kelo ruling at the end of the day would still be in effect. Careful with fire. It burns.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson