Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears
George W Bush was not President 20 years ago.

The US was not fighting a WOT 20 years ago.

The US fought the Gulf war in 1991, and Saddam signed a surrender agreement.

And since then the US media has reported on Saddam and Sons connections to Islamic Cults, his crimes, his billions, his rogue nation status, his terrorist state status with the State Dept, his refusal to show doc of destruction of his WMD, his science, his attack on our pilots, his assassination attempts, the UN's failure to contain.

And now the US media "reports" everyday that the President of the United States lied about a pretext for war, when he has repeatedly said he could not trust him after 9/11, with US boots on the ground fighting in the ME.
30 posted on 06/29/2005 2:17:48 PM PDT by roses of sharon (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: roses of sharon
George W Bush was not President 20 years ago

Thank God. Reagan, with his faults, was actually a conservative. Although he did allow some expansion of domestic spending that shouldn't have happened

The US was not fighting a WOT 20 years ago

No they were not, at least not completely. They were involved in the end of the Cold War. However, there was a WOT going on. Or do you not remember the bombings of the barracks in the ME or Qaddafi's threats in the mid 80s?

The US fought the Gulf war in 1991, and Saddam signed a surrender agreement

The US involved itself in an affair between two nation states, neither of which represented a direct nor present threat to the borders of this nation of states. It was none of our business

And since then the US media has reported on Saddam and Sons connections to Islamic Cults, his crimes, his billions, his rogue nation status, his terrorist state status with the State Dept, his refusal to show doc of destruction of his WMD, his science, his attack on our pilots, his assassination attempts, the UN's failure to contain.

And yet this is the same US media according to you we are not to believe now because as information as been released, some if not all they reported originally was not completely truthful. So we believe them when they support the Republican agenda and not when they report the news that comes in conflict with the Republican agenda?

37 posted on 06/29/2005 6:33:45 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson