Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TightyRighty

Yes, Bale is the better actor. Don't know if you've seen the new Batman but his acting is intelligent, funny, nuanced. He looks like he's having a good time when he acts. Cruise always seems so desperate to be liked. Bale acts like he doesn't give a damn whether he's world famous - and that in my opinion is what makes him so appealing.


50 posted on 06/29/2005 2:03:27 PM PDT by somerville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: somerville

Why it doesn't work. (1) The cliched dysfunctional family: egotistical father, rebellious annoying son (see "The Day After Tomorrow"), (2) No story, peripheral "War", just repetitive hiding from aliens with Dakota Fanning screaming a lot, (3)Tim Robbins' character: One moment he says, "They've been planning this for a million years! This isn't a war! It's an extermination!" The next moment he says, ""We're the resistance! We can kill them!" (4)The ending. In both the Wells book and 1953 classic, the Martians' world is dying and they pick Earth as their best hope for repopulation, so their demise by bacteria is plausible and unexpected. In this version they'd been "planning this for a million years" with their war machines buried here forever, so you'd think they would have figured out that annoying microbe problem. (5) Tom Cruise is a one-note lightweight.


110 posted on 06/30/2005 10:17:17 AM PDT by sandbagger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson