Skip to comments.
Souter gets police protection
Drudge Report ^
| June 29
| mark3681
Posted on 06/29/2005 12:47:56 PM PDT by mark3681
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-364 next last
Do you think any of us would get this attention?
1
posted on
06/29/2005 12:47:58 PM PDT
by
mark3681
To: mark3681
Maybe Justice Souter is starting to feel how put-upon people whose property is taken over feel.
2
posted on
06/29/2005 12:50:47 PM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(Don't suffer fools gladly? I don't suffer them at all.)
To: Darkwolf377
GOOD!!!
We have our own Mullahs....they need to feel the HEAT!
To: mark3681
"Am I taking this seriously? But of course," said Charles Meany, Weare's code enforcement officer. "In lieu of the recent Supreme Court decision, I would imagine that some people are pretty much upset. If it is their right to pursue this type of end, then by all means let the process begin." Wow.
4
posted on
06/29/2005 12:52:31 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: mark3681
"Do you think any of us would get this attention?" In two words: HELL, NO! For us little people, the cops would be the ones performing the eviction.
"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others", don't you know...
5
posted on
06/29/2005 12:52:52 PM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: mark3681
The politicians and judges should fear the populace.
6
posted on
06/29/2005 12:52:55 PM PDT
by
Sir Gawain
(When in doubt, cite the Commerce Clause)
To: mark3681
Charles Meany, Weare's code enforcement officer. "In lieu of the recent Supreme Court decision, I would imagine that some people are pretty much upset. If it is their right to pursue this type of end, then by all means let the process begin."
LOL, did he just say that if under eminent domain the citizenry have the right to such redress, then full steam ahead?
That's what it sounds like to me!
7
posted on
06/29/2005 12:52:55 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Hey troll, Sith happens.)
To: Darkwolf377
Not hardly. He doesn't care. He knows it all, you see.
8
posted on
06/29/2005 12:52:56 PM PDT
by
RexBeach
(Pardon me, but is that a malaise sandwich in your pocket or are you just glad to be in a funk?)
To: carolinacrazy; BerthaDee; cowboyway
At least eight states Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Montana, South Carolina and Washington forbid the use of eminent domain for economic development unless it is to eliminate blight.Perhaps we are not thinking in the correct direction on this move.
And we just had to pay our car taxes. Puke.
The beachfront property, anyone?
9
posted on
06/29/2005 12:53:06 PM PDT
by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: mark3681
10
posted on
06/29/2005 12:53:12 PM PDT
by
passionfruit
(Using the ethernet to try to catch the etherbunny.)
To: mark3681
The the number of people pissed off at him and the other libs members of the supremes, I think he'll need more than the police to protect him.
11
posted on
06/29/2005 12:53:50 PM PDT
by
Right_at_RiceU
(You don't need a gun to kill hippies, just soap or work.)
To: mark3681
Are they providing police protection for those that are being evicted by the police???????
12
posted on
06/29/2005 12:54:01 PM PDT
by
YOUGOTIT
To: mark3681
He gets multiple officers for protection when no one has made a threat against him. Yet a woman who has a restraining order against her murdious husband gets no protection, is killed, and Souter says that's ok, cops have no duty to protect her.
To: mark3681
"Am I taking this seriously? But of course," said Charles Meany, Weare's code enforcement officer. "In lieu of the recent Supreme Court decision, I would imagine that some people are pretty much upset. If it is their right to pursue this type of end, then by all means let the process begin." Sounds as if Mr. Meany is thinking "let's go for it".
14
posted on
06/29/2005 12:54:22 PM PDT
by
CFW
To: mark3681
Sounds like he's easily rattled by public attention. Should probably consider a different line of work.
To: mark3681
As much as we want to dump on Souter politically and legally, and I do, there is a need to be very careful with the security of Supreme Court Justices. It is a bit worrisome if he didn't have protection before. I assume they are concerned because his address has been made public, along with anger about the decision. There are a lot of nuts out there.
When I worked for a court in a very minor capacity, someone showed up taking pictures of my house. I called the police and they were unimpressed. But when they found out I worked for a court that was hearing a major labor racketeering trial they said that was a different story and immediately tracked the guy down. Turned out to be a local realtor getting comparables.
16
posted on
06/29/2005 12:55:08 PM PDT
by
Williams
To: mark3681
A few police cruisers were parked on the edge of Souter's property Tuesday. "It was a precaution, just being protective," said Lt. Mark Bodanza.
I'm sure the good officers would be just as protective if I were trying to keep my property, right?
Man, I feel like a fricking serf, just keeping up the King's property till he wants it back.
17
posted on
06/29/2005 12:55:24 PM PDT
by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: Shermy
Yes, that is soooooo excellent. Even if this effort fails, I hope they keep coming. Souter deserves to live out of his suitcase for the rest of his days.
To: mark3681
Waitaminnit...HE wanted this eminent domain thing, and when a developer comes along who wants to drive a bulldozer through HIS bedroom, he acts as though he's MORE IMPORTANT then those who's homes he guaranteed bulldozers would be driven through.
That's the elite for you: equal rights for nobody, special privilege for some.
19
posted on
06/29/2005 12:55:52 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: chuknospam
Be willing to bet his home is way undervalued because he is a special resident and deserves a discount on his taxes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-364 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson