Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The survey 'fishing expedition' was conducted by the Union of Concerned Scientists and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. The survey posed 34 questions and was sent to 460 NOAA Fisheries scientists across the country. Responses came back from 124, or 27 percent.
1 posted on 06/29/2005 10:11:53 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge
Um.. you're close.
Union of Concerned Socialist Communist Marxist and Unemployed Scientists, along with
Public Employees for Bigger, Fatter Contracts, Higher Taxes, Stronger Unions and Rarely Environmental Responsibility.
2 posted on 06/29/2005 10:18:37 AM PDT by xcamel (Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Uh how's that old saying go? Something like, "figures lie and liars figure" I believe - and this tripe proves it.

  1. "58 percent of respondents said they knew of cases where high-level Commerce Department appointees or managers inappropriately altered NOAA Fisheries determinations."

    Sounds bad doesn't it, but that 58% is horse hockey. Out of the 460 NOAA Fisheries scientists across the country only 27 percent responded (124) so that 58% is only 72 people and it's only 15.6% of all the scientists.

  2. Then we have, "53 percent said blah, blah, blah". That's only 66 people and only 14% of all scientists.

  3. The "13 percent said they knew of cases ... blah, blah" is only 16 stinking people and a whopping 3.5% of all scientists.

  4. Last we have "44 percent said NOAA Fisheries .. (whatever). That's 55 people and a lousy 12% of all 460 scientists.

Ergo this survey is utterly meaningless. How can they even publish it when only 27% even responded? They might as well have taken this 'survey' around their dinner table!

3 posted on 06/29/2005 10:44:32 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

who's to say the findings weren't flawed in the first place?


4 posted on 06/29/2005 10:47:38 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

More Clinton era hires whining. Should have fired them all during the first term.


6 posted on 06/29/2005 11:43:33 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
say they know of cases where scientific findings were altered at the request of commercial interests

Hilarious!
They make it sound like a new phenomenon in cultural politics.

Has any science ever been "altered" at the request of the Bugs and Bunny crowd?
Remember the mountain lion hair scandal? That was out and out fraud!

LOL.

7 posted on 06/29/2005 12:53:35 PM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson