Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...
June 29, 2005, 1:20 AM EDT

HARTFORD, Conn. -- Republican leaders in the state Senate have called for another special session to consider legislation limiting Connecticut's eminent domain laws following its defeat in the General Assembly on Tuesday.

The proposal, offered in response to last week's U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing New London to take homes for a private development project, was killed on a mostly 22-11 party-line vote in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The House of Representatives, which also is run by Democrats, defeated a similar proposal 82-50.

The plans were offered as amendments to legislation that details the two-year, $31.2 billion budget and other provisions.

Republican leaders in the Senate say homeowners need immediate protections in the wake of the court decision, they said.

The GOP proposal would have prevented a municipality or government agency from taking owner-occupied residential property with four or fewer units for a private development project.

"I just don't believe that we should be in the business of taking a family's home away from them for private interests," said Sen. John McKinney, R-Fairfield. "I don't believe we should stand up and say private corporate needs, private development needs, trump individual rights."

-snip-

Republicans said that the Senate, which was meeting in special session on Tuesday, has passed legislation before that hasn't gone through the regular public hearing process. They urged passage by the General Assembly now to protect constituents.

"I would much rather err on the side of going too far to protect individual homeowners and property owners ... than protecting some government agency that wants to take their home because they have the authority, the awesome power to do so because of economic gain," said Sen. David Cappiello, R-Danbury.

House Minority Leader Robert Ward, R-North Branford, said he plans next year to resurrect a bill that died last session preventing the taking of property in Connecticut for economic development.

-snip-

Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell and House Speaker James Amann, D-Milford, said last week they are interested in revisiting Connecticut's eminent domain laws next year.

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

64 posted on 06/30/2005 8:45:08 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FortRumbull; NautiNurse; Howlin

Please see #64 for the latest on the land grab situation in our RAT-infested state of Connecticut.


65 posted on 06/30/2005 8:46:55 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
Just got home from having the car serviced. Sat down in the waiting room where two liberal women were going on and on about the sorry state of affairs in our nation. I kept my mouth shut until the louder of the two was explaining to the ignorant one about the eminent domain decision.

I finally spoke up to ask whether she knew which justices voted for it and against it. She didn't know--and she didn't believe me the first two times I told her. Stoopid maroons.

67 posted on 06/30/2005 9:30:08 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson