[listenhillary]

bookmark

[lOKKI]

The Democrats are locked in the mode of those with plenty of criticisms but no suggestions. Where is the well-defined alternative plan? They've gotten to the point where Bush could have personally introduced Jesus during his speech and gotten him to sign autographs afterward, and the Democrats would have found something to criticize.

[Peach]

The one to bookmark is here:
That and more here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1327993/posts

Families sue Iraq over 9/11. Thousands of 9/11 victims and family members sue Iraq based on evidence that Iraq knew the attacks were coming, approved the attacks, and supported Al Qaeda for a decade. The lawsuit also notes Iraq's involvement in the first WTC attack.
September 5, 2002. CBS.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/05/september11/main520874.shtml

In the 90's, before this became a political football, the MSM wrote about the world's alarm at the growing relationship between Iraq and AQ/OBL dozens of times and a few of the headline articles are here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/946809/posts?page=1

[Galtoid]

Amnesia: This is what Democrats and liberals are suffering from. There's no other way to explain it. This treasonous bunch of America-haters has tried and tried to completely wipe out the memories of that horrific day with their politics of Bush-bashing and terrorist-loving haranguing, coupled with a complicit media who want the same thing. Their propoganda since 9/12/01 has been to diminish the implications of the attacks and to delegitimize Bush's leadership as a wartime president. For him to have (in their minds) the audacity to "still" maintain a link between 9/11 and Iraq, just makes them boil with anger.
For the Democrat Party, a retreat in Iraq translates into a political victory for them. Think about that! If the United States military operations were to fail or were to be cut short of a victorious finish, the Democrats would be gleeful. Something very very sick about that. But it's true.