Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft helps China to censor bloggers [Words "freedom" and "democracy" not allowed.]
Guardian Unlimited ^ | 15JUN05 | Jonathan Watts

Posted on 06/29/2005 12:58:25 AM PDT by familyop

Civil liberties groups have condemned an arrangement between Microsoft and Chinese authorities to censor the internet.

The American company is helping censors remove "freedom" and "democracy" from the net in China with a software package that prevents bloggers from using these and other politically sensitive words on their websites.

The restrictions, which also include an automated denial of "human rights", are built into MSN Spaces, a blog service launched in China last month by Shanghai MSN Network Communications Technology, a venture in which Microsoft holds a 50% stake.

Users who try to include such terms in subject lines are warned: "This topic contains forbidden words. Please delete them."

Even the most basic political discussion is difficult because "communism", "socialism", and "capitalism" are blocked in this way, although these words can be used in the body of the main text. Many taboo words are predictable, such as "Taiwanese independence", "Tibet", "Dalai Lama", "Falun Gong", "terrorism" and "massacre". But there are also quirks that reflect the embryonic nature of net censorship and the propaganda ministry's perceived threats.

The word "demonstration" is taboo, but "protest" is all right; "democracy" is forbidden, but "anarchy" and "revolution" are acceptable. On MSN Space, Chinese bloggers cannot use the name of their own president, but can comment on Tony Blair. "Tiananmen" cannot be mentioned.

A Microsoft spokesman said the restrictions were the price the company had to pay to spread the positive benefits of blogs and online messaging.

"Even with the filters, we're helping millions of people communicate, share stories, share photographs and build relationships. For us, that is the key point here," Adam Sohn, a global sales and marketing director at MSN, told the Associated Press news agency.

For the Chinese government, which employs an estimated 30,000 internet police, the restrictions are an extension of a long-standing policy to control the web so that it can be used by businesses but not by political opponents.

For Microsoft, it appears to be a concession to authoritarianism on the net. It comes only months after Microsoft's boss, Bill Gates, praised China's leaders, who have mixed market economics with rigid political control. "It is a brand new form of capitalism, and as a consumer it's the best thing that ever happened," he said.

Along with a throng of other net giants, Microsoft is trying to make inroads into China's fast-growing internet market, expected to top 100 million users this year. Only the United States has more people online, but Mr Gates admitted this year that his company was underperforming in China.

Microsoft is not alone in accepting censorship requests from China. The free-speech group, Reporters Without Borders, says Yahoo has a similar policy. The group said any justification for collaborating with Chinese censorship based on obeying local laws did "not hold water". The multinationals must "respect certain basic ethical principles" wherever they operated.

China's information industry ministry, meanwhile, has ordered owners of blogs and bulletin boards to register their sites by the end of this month or have them shut down.

The ministry's website said: "The internet has profited many people, but it also has brought many problems, such as sex, violence and feudal superstitions and other harmful information that has seriously poisoned people's spirits."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: censor; censorship; china; fascism; free; microsoft; trade
I didn't previously see this one.
1 posted on 06/29/2005 12:58:27 AM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1429733/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1422693/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1422525/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1421805/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1421252/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420613/posts
2 posted on 06/29/2005 1:01:03 AM PDT by Crazieman (6-23-2005, Establishment of the United Socialist States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Thanks.


3 posted on 06/29/2005 1:07:58 AM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop
A Microsoft spokesman said the restrictions were the price the company had to pay to spread the positive benefits of blogs and online messaging.

Liberty is priceless, but not to Microsoft, apparently.

4 posted on 06/29/2005 1:09:26 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

File under: ANYTHING FOR A BUCK!


5 posted on 06/29/2005 1:15:51 AM PDT by jocon307 (Can we close the border NOW?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Many taboo words are predictable, such as "Taiwanese independence", "Tibet", "Dalai Lama", "Falun Gong", "terrorism" and "massacre".

Well if I lived in China, I bet there would be a way to express myself clearly without tripping the taboo line. Some freedom is internal, the heart and mind of each man, and can't be suppressed by this kind of nonsense. These censors must blush when they look in the mirror.
6 posted on 06/29/2005 1:20:56 AM PDT by carumba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop
[For the Chinese government, which employs an estimated 30,000 internet police, the restrictions are an extension of a long-standing policy to control the web so that it can be used by businesses but not by political opponents.]




This will prove ineffective so quickly that the Chinese government won't know what the hell happened.

To allow their citizens access and then to censor out certain words assuming that will keep them from learning forbidden ideas is laughable.

I suspect that their leaders actually want democracy and free markets to replace communism and they're just publicly going through the motions of "censorship" because they believe it's expected of them.

Yes, I'm serious.
7 posted on 06/29/2005 1:23:19 AM PDT by spinestein (The facts fairly and honestly presented, truth will take care of itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carumba
...I bet there would be a way to express myself clearly without tripping the taboo line...

Michael Savage once mentioned that if the powers that be restricted his free speech he'd start a cooking show and work his little political barbs into the dialog.
8 posted on 06/29/2005 1:23:47 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
...atsa spicey meatballa.
9 posted on 06/29/2005 1:40:11 AM PDT by carumba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Where do you want to go today?
10 posted on 06/29/2005 1:43:41 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carumba

On the bright side, we could get that meatball recipie he constantly alludes to on the show


11 posted on 06/29/2005 1:46:52 AM PDT by Crazieman (6-23-2005, Establishment of the United Socialist States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson