[Earthdweller]

Mary..I sympathize with you and your motives for letting your relative go. The book is not about end of life decisions. Micheal may have had other motives that you may have not considered. Fuhrman doesn't care if it was right to let Terri go in the end.

If Micheal was somehow a part of causing Terri to be in her end condition..wouldn't you want to know?

[ContraryMary]

Earthdweller: Mary..I sympathize with you and your motives for letting your relative go.

Huh? I didn't say anything about letting a relative go. I merely told Hildy that Fuhrman didn't reveal anything new. Talk about a non sequitur!

Earthdweller: The book is not about end of life decisions.

Again, all I told Hildy was that Fuhrman didn't reveal anything new.

Earthdweller: Micheal may have had other motives that you may have not considered. Fuhrman doesn't care if it was right to let Terri go in the end.

I didn't say anything about Michael's motives, either. I just said Fuhrman didn't reveal anything new.

Earthdweller: If Micheal was somehow a part of causing Terri to be in her end condition..wouldn't you want to know?

Sure. However, it's been investigated, scrutinized, gone over with a fine tooth comb for 15 years. And no one, including Mark Fuhrman, has come up with anything new. Isn't it time for the tinfoil hat crowd to consider the possibility there isn't anything more to learn?