[calex59]

Oh, yeah, a guy that blew the OJ case by his sloppy investigation techniques is telling people how someone else screwed up. This guy is just doing this for money. I wouldn't believe anything he wrote. It might be entertaining but I wouldn't believe any of it or put any credence in his speculations.

[John Robertson]

Furhman could have had VIDEO of OJ beheading those two people and the jury STILL would have acquitted. That trial, in case you didn't realize, was never about the evidence.

[woofie]

see #18

[isthisnickcool]

Oh, yeah, a guy that blew the OJ case by his sloppy investigation techniques is telling people how someone else screwed up. This guy is just doing this for money. I wouldn't believe anything he wrote. It might be entertaining but I wouldn't believe any of it or put any credence in his speculations.

Please describe how Fuhrman's "sloppy investigation techniques blew the OJ case".

Some people might not agree that Fuhrman is a bad investigator. One such person is Michael Skakel.

[middie]

right on! I wouldn't trust that creep to take out the trash much less critique the supposedly undelying facts of the Schaivo case.

[RebelBanker]

Whatever you may think of him, Fuhrman obviously went to Florida with an agenda. No one would want to read a book in which the "great detective" said that there was no crime. Thus, he had to find at least 'suspicion.'

[Criminal Number 18F]

a guy that blew the OJ case by his sloppy investigation techniques is telling people how someone else screwed up.

and...[someone else asked]...

Why is Fuhrman someone we should take seriously?

First, his only error in the OJ case was denying he'd ever used the n-word when some liberal reporter had him on tape. A dumb error.

Second, his book on the Greenwich murder forced a PD and DA, that had been complicit in a cover-up of long standing, to confront a heinous crime committed by a former resident from a distinguished family. Fuhrman's review of the evidence ultimately resulted in the perp, who had boasted that his family connexions and wealth gave him immunity, going up the river.

Using racist language isn't right, and certainly Fuhrman's lie about that contributed to the injustice that set OJ free. But consider the Blake and Jackson cases and what they say about law in California. And balance that against getting a wealthy murderer convicted.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

[Mind-numbed Robot]

One thing for certain, you just blew your own credibility with this group, with me at the top of the list.

[sugarbabe]

It wasn't sloppy investigation, in my opinion he did a pretty good job, it was his denial of ever using the n word and then being proven wrong that hurt the case.

[Xenalyte]

Um, no. What blew the OJ case was an abjectly incompetent prosecution team combined with an abysmally stupid jury.

[Delphinium]

a guy that blew the OJ case by his sloppy investigation techniques is telling people how someone else screwed up.

I can't say his behavior was perfect, but who says the evidence was wrong? Those blacks would have found OJ not guilty no matter what proof was there.