Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LonePalm
Could be so now, but all the beet sugar processing plants in Idaho and Utah went belly up in the 70's. The only beet farmers there now grow them for cattle feed. I do know that beets produce less sugar per ton than cane.

See this article. In part: "To ensure high sugar prices, the Department of Agriculture constrains the supply by designating the overall domestic sugar consumption in advance. FY 2005's allotment is about 8.1 million tons. The 2002 Farm Bill set the foreign import ceiling at 1.53 million tons, but the administration only allowed 1.23 million tons for FY 2005, which is the amount determined by the WTO Uruguay Round Agreement. As Kudlow suggested, CAFTA's 109,000 tons increase is nothing compared to the 300,000 tons the administration could add. The Farm Bill also mandated a fixed proportion between the cane sugar and beet sugar production of 54.35 percent to 45.65 percent, respectively."

In short, domestic beet production is being propped up by subsidies and import controls on foreign cane sugar.

26 posted on 06/29/2005 10:26:28 AM PDT by LexBaird (tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird
I have no arguement with what you posted.

I approach the subject from a culinary standpoint. Either way its not as sweet as a winning lottery ticket.

'La bonne cuisine est la base du véritable bonheur.' - Auguste Escoffier
(Good food is the foundation of genuine happiness.)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

27 posted on 06/29/2005 10:32:06 AM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson