Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SAJ; Blood of Tyrants; Regulator; ovrtaxt; Dog Gone; poobear; jwalsh07; Gritty; ...
"I suppose so, but don't really know the procedure for removing a sitting federal judge."

===============================

In this case it is the majority of the United States Supreme Court - the oligarchy - we are concerned with.

Impeaching the majority of the U.S.S.C. would cause the legal branch of our government to come to a screeching halt.

This crisis does however prove one thing though - the oligarchy is in definite and unquestionable control of both of the other bodies of United States government.

(Do we detect an imbalance here somewhere?)


* * *

Is There A Backbone In The House?

* * *

Has the Supreme Court Shown the Hand of Authoritarian Free Enterprise?

ol•i•gar•chy
Pronunciation: 'ä-l&-"gär-kE, 'O-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -chies
Date: 1542
1 : government by the few
2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control
3 : an organization under oligarchic control

sov•er•eign•ty
Variant(s): also sov•ran•ty /-tE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English soverainte, from Middle French soveraineté, from Old French, from soverain
Date: 14th century
1 obsolete : supreme excellence or an example of it
2 a : supreme power especially over a body politic b : freedom from external control : AUTONOMY c : controlling influence
3 : one that is SOVEREIGN; especially : an autonomous state

42 posted on 06/28/2005 12:15:05 PM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Happy2BMe
"I suppose so, but don't really know the procedure for removing a sitting federal judge."

Complaints against federal judges filed under the Judicial Improvements Act of 2002, Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 351-364, which replaced the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980, 28 U.S.C § 372(c) effective November 2, 2002.

Pitifully, they judge each each other. The fox is guarding the hen house...they know it, and flip you off. It's up to our ball-less congress to reel the courts in.

48 posted on 06/28/2005 12:24:53 PM PDT by Smartass (Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe

Some of the Founding Fathers in 1787 thought it likely an oligarcy would arise, and there is no reason to believe we are not well on the way.


51 posted on 06/28/2005 12:25:49 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe
Awesome post!

Impeaching the majority of the U.S.S.C. would cause the legal branch of our government to come to a screeching halt

Something that is now necessary. The pause should be filled with debate in the Congress as to how to bring the Judiciary back into control - By amendments, or an entire re-write of the section of the Constitution dealing with the powers of the Judiciary.

The un-Constitutional nullification of legitimate laws stemming from Marbury and the conjuring of new "rights" out of whole cloth needs to be stopped, and a check mechanism put in place which would give either the States or the Congress the power to reverse such rulings should they be made.

81 posted on 06/28/2005 2:03:04 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson