Skip to comments.
Developer seeks Souter's property
worldnetdaily.com ^
| 6/28/2005
| Ron Strom
Posted on 06/28/2005 11:04:00 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-222 next last
To: dead
41
posted on
06/28/2005 11:15:09 AM PDT
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: ovrtaxt
Does anyone want to go in on a B&B in Chappiqua?
I'll bet we can make a fortune with the Kennedy Compound!
42
posted on
06/28/2005 11:15:35 AM PDT
by
pageonetoo
(You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
To: ovrtaxt
43
posted on
06/28/2005 11:15:54 AM PDT
by
cvq3842
To: ovrtaxt
Souter should retire immediately to confront this.
44
posted on
06/28/2005 11:16:00 AM PDT
by
TChad
To: ken5050
45
posted on
06/28/2005 11:16:19 AM PDT
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: ovrtaxt
I need to book a reservation to be the first to stay in the Souter Suite!
46
posted on
06/28/2005 11:16:27 AM PDT
by
MileHi
To: CGVet58
schadenfreude does not serve us well here, much less serve our 5th amendment. The 5th must be re-instated for ALL citizens, even those who undermine our core rights such as that little socialist, Souter. Or, are we now to be reduced to tacit compliance with this rape of the Constitution, basing our yeas and nays solely on whether or not the person who's property rights are being violated finds favor in our eyes? This is being done primarily as a political statement to point out the folly of the decision to those responsible for making it.
47
posted on
06/28/2005 11:17:31 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(“It’s good to remember whom people turn to when they’re desperate — and it ain’t Kofi Annan.”)
To: ovrtaxt
48
posted on
06/28/2005 11:17:43 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
Comment #49 Removed by Moderator
To: ovrtaxt
Oh, the delicious irony of it all. :-)
50
posted on
06/28/2005 11:17:57 AM PDT
by
TChris
("You tweachewous miscweant!" -- Elmer Fudd)
To: ovrtaxt
Another thread from a different article is
here.
51
posted on
06/28/2005 11:18:21 AM PDT
by
Jersey Republican Biker Chick
(People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
To: ovrtaxt
Hey we need to contact the town council and start lobbying for the project.
52
posted on
06/28/2005 11:18:42 AM PDT
by
agincourt1415
(4 More Years of NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN!)
Comment #53 Removed by Moderator
To: ovrtaxt
54
posted on
06/28/2005 11:19:29 AM PDT
by
djreece
("... Until He leads justice to victory." Matt. 12:20c)
To: Williams
Well, he said he only needs 3 out of 5 selectmen. It might be a little more complicated than that (planning board, countersuits, etc) but it might be worth it to push some folks to run for seats on that board. This is doable, I think.
55
posted on
06/28/2005 11:19:51 AM PDT
by
Fido969
("The story is true" - Dan Rather)
To: CGVet58
Or, are we now to be reduced to tacit compliance with this rape of the Constitution, basing our yeas and nays solely on whether or not the person who's property rights are being violated finds favor in our eyes? Do you not get the idea of theatrical protest? (those weren't really Indians at the Boston Tea Party)
Souter will not lose his home, of course, but he will be forced to confront the implications of decision on a personal level. And the media will be forced to discuss the implications as well, particularly if a slight majority on this town planning commission feels like stirring the pot too.
56
posted on
06/28/2005 11:20:59 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: agincourt1415
Hey we need to contact the town council and start lobbying for the project. My family will book a vaction there if they build it.
57
posted on
06/28/2005 11:21:35 AM PDT
by
MileHi
To: ovrtaxt
I love to see this kind of cleverness and creativity from conservatives.
58
posted on
06/28/2005 11:21:40 AM PDT
by
sawoody
To: CGVet58
Destruction of private property may not have been right, but the Boston Tea Party had a salutary effect.
To: pageonetoo
I'll bet we can make a fortune with the Kennedy Compound! Wasn't it Bush '41 who put Souter on the Supreme Court?
I think there is a nice little property in Kennecut, Maine that would make a nice luxury resort hotel.
60
posted on
06/28/2005 11:22:08 AM PDT
by
jackbenimble
(Import the third world, become the third world)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-222 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson