Developer seeks Souter's property

worldnetdaily.com ^ | 6/28/2005 | Ron Strom

[Chuckster]

Its done. The only way to undo it is for the USSC to take another case and reverse the earlier decision.

Not true. Congress can enact legislation correcting the situation.

In the time between now and them we can have some fun and make a point of beating these people over the heads with their own club.

And that's how we get Congress to act. The court will not change its mind.

[Hostage]

Please give a clue where you live. Sounds like Heaven!

[Hostage]

You're right that IS how we get Congress to act, by creating such chaotic hell with the ruling that they must pass a referendum of sorts to rein in the SCOTUS.

But then that calls into question the long-standing debate over Madison vs. Marsbury.

Revisiting the latter should be a major campaign issue!

[Ultra Sonic]

Don't forget; when Bush the Elder put Souter on the Supreme Court, Souter was supposed to be a conservative. As it turned out, he was merely a liberal in disguise.

Souter has transformed from a CINO (Conservative in Name Only) to a pure liberal.

And this plan...pure genius. Kudos!

[Hetty_Fauxvert]

In our massive glee at putting the shoe on the other foot ... let us not forget that although this is great fun (and I still want to see Souter standing in front of his city council!), it does NOT reverse the SCOTUS decision. We need to keep working on changing that. Remember to keep supporting Senator John Cornyn's The Protection of Homes, Small Businesses, and Private Property Act of 2005! Call your representatives and tell them you want them to support it! Here's the toll-free number to reach your congresscritter and senators at the Capitol: 1-877-762-8762.

Making Souter squirm is too much fun to stop now! But it won't get the job done. Call your congresscritter and support the Protection of Homes Act!

[Mears]

Thanks---will do---sounds like fun!

[JDoutrider]

Got ta love it!!! Where do I send my donation???

[omronnie]

Souter and the rest of the slime 5 deserve to taste the bitter medicine they imposed upon us.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Hey, let's really get ticked off.

Let's see to it that all Congressmen, Senators, Presidents and Supreme Court Justices, as a selfless byproduct of being elected, have to:

1. Send their children to public schools.

2. Have to retire on Social 'Scurity' like the rest of us
do.

3. Have to get in line for trips to the hospital, and the
attendant 8:00 AM appointment with 2:00 PM "The doctor
will see you now", thingy.

4. That the citizens will buy a piece of property along the
border with Mexico and that the Congress will have to
spend 10 days a year during (their), oops, I'm sorry, let
me dumb myself down, (there) vacation.

5. That any property they own will be subject to
Eminent Domain and could go 'Bu Bye' at any moment.

6. That they will have to be pulled out of line at
airports for the extreme 'Cop a Feel Exam' before
boarding.

My clash point is this: WE THE PEOPLE !!!

[omronnie]

Considering how much was raised for Tsunami relief, I think this can be done and this is a much better cause in my book.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You my friend, are the 'Master of Understatement'.

[omronnie]

Around here he’d not only have to supply *detailed* plans – they’d cover a variety of areas. They’d cover how his development intends to approach things like water, sewer, gas, and electricity. They’d have to address grade issues and whether/not their structures obstruct views. They’d have to address wastewater runoff and containment. Hell, they’d have to delve into specifics concerning how their development will impact the surrounding area regarding noise and traffic – disclose how many employees they’d be hiring, from where, and where they’d be living and where their kids would be attending school and where/how those employees would do things like eat lunch or fuel their cars or catch the bus or whatever. Yep – many things go into big developments and they don’t start out by faxing a quickie-request or pencil sketch on a napkin. Let him spend the next 8 years and 12 million doing all the studies to support his proposal and I’ll believe he’s something other than a blowhard. A lot of people think you just get yourself a piece of land and build a building and go into business turning out widgets or renting out rooms. Doesn't quite work that way. Many, many, many hoops to jump through. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. Perrrrrrrrrrrrrrrfect !! I can see it now, Souters property is tied up for the next 86 years and his heirs are all frustrated slepping back and forth to COURT !!! What sweet JUSTICE !!! . Pardon me, but I'm getting absolutely giddy at this point.

[RightWinger]

Cool!

[gitmo]

I can't find a number I'll stay there every vacation.

[rvoitier]

B O S T O N
T E A
P A R T Y
! 2 0 0 5 !

[icu2]

schadenfreude does not serve us well here, much less serve our 5th amendment. The 5th must be re-instated for ALL citizens, even those who undermine our core rights such as that little socialist, Souter.

This needs to be done just to show these twerps what the reality of there decisions is. It has to effect them personally. I hope it moves forward to completion unless he reverses his decision

[mr_hammer]

Agreed, each time a poor home owner is booted for a mall or box store the populace should raise up and claim the mayor's dwelling also.

[unixfox]

I think the court will see the error of its ways.

Never!! They are just like every good socialist, stupid is as stupid does.

I hope they bulldoze his house and burn it to the ground. I'll light the match.

[skr]

Let's not forget that it was not a unanimous decision. Only five properties are required to get the idea across.

[An Old Man]

"Please give a clue where you live. Sounds like Heaven!"

If I tell you, then everyone else will want to come here also. So I won't tell.

Yes, My bride of 41 years and I think it is just like Heaven. With the grace of god, we will someday, move to the real one.

Semper Fi

[SWake]

We can start with Arlington, Texas. They voted Tuesday to start E-D proceedings against homeowners who have not yet agreed to sell out to make way for the new Cowboys stadium.

[grey_whiskers]

I'm thinking of opening up a whorehouse on Ruth Bader Ginsberg's property.

What, you're going to clean the place up? ;-)

Cheers!