Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SlowBoat407

I believe the original premise of the book was that no matter how powerful we think we are, there's always going to be someone bigger. His ultimate irony was that the bigger, stronger, smarter enemy was brought down by the smallest among us.

Anyone see Lord of the Rings?


13 posted on 06/28/2005 10:42:31 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (Taglines are supposed to have meaning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: SlowBoat407

In LoTR Frodo prevails to Mt. Doom because of his desire to be rid of the ring, combined with the help from outside in the form of the new king of Gondor coming to challenge Sauron. (Of course even there he's unable to resist the lure of power and poor Smeagol has to take the dive). But Frodo has to go right into the heart of the enemy's power through danger and struggle and temptation.

That's a long long way from "do nothing, relax, and the problem will cure itself, man." That sort of approach was illustrated in LoTR (the movies, not the book) when Pip suggested they just give up and go home and leave everything for someone else to deal with. The closest JRRT himself gets to that is the bit in the Silmarillion where the 'Valar' call the Elves to Aman and abandon Middle-Earth in the first age (but really that sequence is more of a allegorical rejection of Deism IMO).

The 'nature will take care of what man cannot' is a theme in War of the Worlds, but don't extend it to Tolkein's work, please.


28 posted on 06/28/2005 11:01:38 AM PDT by No.6 (www.fourthfightergroup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson