Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
A co-chairwoman of the Out of Iraq Caucus
More like the 'Out of Orbit Caucus'.
It's the usual suspects...John "Commie" Conyers, Barbara "I'm the only member of Congress to vote against military action in Afghanistan" Lee, Zoe Lofgren, Nancy "Bela" Pelosi. They're pathetic socialists, period. It's disgraceful they get voted into office in the first place.
The liberal hatred is so intense that they daily dump on the U.S., the military and Dubya and then wipe their collective behinds with the American flag. (Figurtively speaking)
They proudly declare that it is their constitutional right to engage in this behavior, which they proudly call dissent. Their blindness to the harm it does our country and servicemen in time of war will continue to doom their electoral chances. They are telling American that the "Weak on Defense" issue is alive and will cost Democrats dearly.
They continue to fail to see how their actions and rhetoric make them very suceptible to the Flag Burning Ammendment. That is why Republicans routinely propose this Ammendment! In a normal world where both parties actually love their country and institutions this Ammendment would not have any downside consequences for either party and would be deemed totally unneccesary. They are pathetic and will pay dearly for their hatred, especially in the 2006 elections.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Nutbags... but they have an audience... sigh.
These liberal leftists demoncRATS can't stand the thought that their demoncRAT prez has the singular title of being the impeached prez. They're trying to find a way to have the pubs share the title. They're so transparent.
Conyers is a good name for him - he's a con-man and any California Democrat really shouldn't be taken all that seriously either.
In other words, there's no story here.
The whole piece is about some reporter at 'The Hill' filling up space.
I believe they SHOULD convene a real hearing. Present the evidence. Trot out that Downing Street Memo/Minutes. Let them see how THAT stands up in a real court of law. The DimocRATs aren't willing to take the sworn eye-witness testimony of the Swift Boat vets, but ARE willing to accept a transcribed copy of a photo-copied document from an anonymous source which doesn't quote anyone directly but gives opinion as to how someone else is thinking. Ok ... let them take that to court. It should be a riot.
All President Bush would have to do is swear that, at the time, he believed the intelligence he was given. And then, get every other member of Congress to swear to the same, except for Teddy Kennedy because his word is worthless.
Have the Democrats just lost all of the little reasoning they had? The Republicans control everyting, and they re still flapping and quacking and trying to find grounds for impeachment. How much more can I stand?
Why don't they impeach him over the borders and the North American Community crap?
Those are valid reasons.
This is good news. The whackier they get, the more marginalized they become. Are they really going to run on this as an agenda in the next election. "Vote for us, we promise to impeach Bush. A plan for social security, taxes, healthcare? Sure, our plan is to say NO (to anything but raising taxes)!! But we can promise to impeach Bush."
Ok, let them trot out the Downing Street memo or any other memo (read crafted on a copy machine) that they want. It says nothing new and adds nothing new that WAS NOT BEFORE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DURING THE LAST ELECTION, i.e. the entire John Kerry campaign, every whacky charge from moron.org and every half baked "documentary" from Michael Moore (food for may fat guy please).
Herein lies the rub. The issue of Bush lying and deceiving our country into war was put before the ultimate authority in our country, namely, the American People. They voted, they spoke in a clear voice. But that answer just didn't and doesn't suit the democrat pary. They continue to show contempt for the voters and are clearly seeking to ANNUL the election, no more, no less.
Let them fire away. Let them continue to root for our enemies around the world. Let them continue to advance kook theories. Most of all, let them continue to think that the liberal echo chamber (broadcast by the MSM) they live in reflects a majority view.
Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
I have been wrong in the past, but I am pretty sure that there is going to be another presidential election in three years.
Let me say right off hand that Bush did not lie to Congress. But former President Clinton lied under oath, knowing what the penalty of perjury was, and because of that act a U.S. Citizen was denied justice.
Congressional Democrats seems to think that "misleading" them is more heinous that lying under oath. Figures.
On Mark Levin's show tonight a guy called in and said something like this:
Hilderbeast should go to Iraq and construct the Iraqi Constitution, she's the smartest woman in the world; and the U.S. should make sure she stays there.
Kerry should go to Africa and show them how to win the war he was in; and then they should make him their General.
Kennedy should go to Afghanistan and show them how to make booze, like his father made all his money and then he should stay there to make sure the quality of liquor is high in octane.
I totally agree with this idea, and I'm willing to buy a one way plane ticket for any one of them, how about you guys?
I was at one time a democrat, I changed parties after Carter, Democrats today are NOT the democrats before Carter.
the part i enjoy about this stupidity are the "intellectuals" in college towns that think president bush was the only one who thought saddam had wmd.
nevermind that kerry, kennedy, clinton, et al and the germans, french, russians, et al all had the same intelligence.
and then, finally, almost no one remembers that it was president clinton that signed the removal of saddam bill.
Let me understand this? Conyers, Boxer and Pelosi, who had only good things to say about their saviour William Jefferson Clinton (who happened to ignore all of the little terrorist attacks during his reign) think that the American people will buy their bulls$it about W purposely leading this nation to war? As they wear their politics under every else's noses as a badge of honor, and while they ignore the present and future security of this country, I think that the American people are watching very closely. They, the American people, will see these political opportunists for what they are and will cause more losses for the jackass party in 2006 and 2008.......