Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hunter112
Maybe this is a good reason to start taxing church properties. If they generate tax revenue, the same as any other entity, it will be harder to make a case that there will be a public benefit by seizing them for taxable development.

Kind of mixed feelings on this issue...

I'm an evangelical pastor. Of course, our church enjoys the "subsidy" of no property taxes on our buildings. Of course, we feel we provide services and positive benefits for our community.

But on the other hand, if we paid our "fair share," no one could tell us to shut up, we could have a real voice in the affairs of the community, etc.

It is absolutely true...whoever pays the band gets to call the tune.

62 posted on 06/29/2005 5:39:26 AM PDT by Ulysses ("Most of us go through life thinking we're Superman. Superman goes through life being Clark Kent!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Ulysses
dear pastor, you are mistaken on this issue, our not paying taxes is not a subsidy any more than and money you do not give to the government is a subsidy.

The reason the government does not tax the church is because, at an earlier time, people understood that the church was not under the authority of the government, ....while you individually are, the church is not....but alas that was a long time ago before we began to see everything/one as an entity subservient to government.

70 posted on 06/29/2005 10:59:03 AM PDT by reflecting (I'm reading what all of you are saying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson