To: Smile-n-Win
:) Would that it succeeded.
Souter will appeal privately to his contacts to find a way to argue that he is exempt fromt he rule. Perhaps the rule will be modified so as not to apply to those working in the judicial branch (how's that for elitism?).
But since Souter is the person who made up symbolic speech as a protected form of speech, such that its expression overrules other laws, it is ironic that the concept of symbolic speech may be used against him. Which will also be modified in some decision so as not to apply.
Justice Thomas had to shame him into opposing cross burning, as thanks to Souter, it was supposedly protected speech.
6 posted on
06/28/2005 3:52:09 AM PDT by
saveliberty
(Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
To: saveliberty
Souter will appeal...
Hopefully his case will reach the SC again, where he, as plaintiff, would have to recuse himself. The case would then be decided by a different majority and, God willing, be OVERTURNED IN SOUTER'S FAVOR! How's that for wishful thinking?
To: saveliberty
Souter will appeal privately to his contacts to find a way to argue that he is exempt fromt he rule. Perhaps the rule will be modified so as not to apply to those working in the judicial branch (how's that for elitism?)...
Just like Clinton being excluded from testifying about past liaisons in a Sexual Harassment lawsuit.
How appropriate!
212 posted on
06/28/2005 12:05:42 PM PDT by
jackieaxe
(English speaking, tax paying, law abiding citizen.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson