Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas

Power to weight ratio has a lot to do with it too. If you have relatively high power vehicle with a relatively low weight (12-15 lbs per hp), as long as it is not geared too steep or accelerating too hard to get up to speed, decent fuel economy is essentially a given, and while youre right wind resistance does increase geometrically, it doesn't overcompensate for a decent power/weight ratio in detracting from fuel economy. Add the higher speed/fuel efficency powerband, and the fuel efficency factor is not adversely effected by speed unless you are way up there in velocity, like 95+mph or more.

From Nashville TN to Baton Rouge, LA, going I-40, I-55, and I-12/10, doing 65 on the trip down I averaged 20.98 mpg. From Baton Rouge back to Nashville, I did 75-85 most of the way, depending on where I was (didn't do much over 80 in TN for fear of the lawman), and I got 26.35 mpg.


166 posted on 06/28/2005 6:42:45 AM PDT by Schwaeky ("Truth is not determined by Majority vote"-- Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Schwaeky

Power to weight ratio doesn't effect fuel economy at cruising speeds. Power to weight ratios are a determining factor in the fuel burned to reach that speed.


195 posted on 06/28/2005 10:31:04 AM PDT by Melas (Lives in state of disbelief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson