Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Rules Against File Swapping
CNET.com ^
| June 27, 2005
| John Borland
Posted on 06/27/2005 9:34:03 AM PDT by Bush2000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
You can now expect a raft of lawsuits against all of the P2P providers. It's going to get pretty messy.
1
posted on
06/27/2005 9:34:08 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
Unanimous decision. I guess they consulted that 'Thou Shall Not Steal' Commandment.
2
posted on
06/27/2005 9:36:36 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: Bush2000
They can all file bankruptcy, start new companies and start all over. Music-swapping won't end because of this ruling.
3
posted on
06/27/2005 9:37:33 AM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: Bush2000
Maybe firms that provide file swapping services should argue that using/disseminating others private property will fuel economic redevelopment via increased local tax revenues. Then stealing...err...using eminent domain to acquire...these files would be perfectly legit.
To: Borges
They forgot that amendment when they decided who has dominion over real estate.
To: Borges
Unanimous decision. I guess they consulted that 'Thou Shall Not Steal' Commandment.That's an illegal mingling of Church and State.
6
posted on
06/27/2005 9:39:00 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
To: Borges
Unanimous decision. I guess they consulted that 'Thou Shall Not Steal' Commandment.But since these file-swapping programs can (and are) used for leagl purposes, isn't that kinda like going after GM for manufacturing bank robbery getaway cars???
To: Sgt_Schultze
They forgot that amendment when they decided who has dominion over real estate.No lie. This is the most selectively-moral, anti-freedom Court in the history of America.
8
posted on
06/27/2005 9:40:05 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
To: Lazamataz
This is the most selectively-moral, anti-freedom Court in the history of America. And what's interesting is that the Republican Party and the Republican President aren't reaming them for it. In fact, The Other Big Government Party is mum and probably fine with it.
9
posted on
06/27/2005 9:42:04 AM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: NittanyLion
To: Bush2000
LimeWire and Kazaa still up and running!
11
posted on
06/27/2005 9:43:14 AM PDT
by
infocats
To: Hank Rearden
And what's interesting is that the Republican Party and the Republican President aren't reaming them for it. In fact, The Other Big Government Party is mum and probably fine with it.Silence gives assent.
There is no longer a party that represents the American citizen.
12
posted on
06/27/2005 9:44:54 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
To: infocats
This is going to put a severe cramp on the folks who deploy P2P networks. BitTorrent, Grokster, Kazaa, Gnutella, Morpheus, Limewire, etc. They're all going to be held responsibile for copyright violations on their networks. And keep in mind, those violations have reached the point of criminality, so the FBI (which previously had a wait and see attitude, pending this case) can now get involved in prosecuting these folks. So filing bankrupty and putting up a new shingle isn't going to help them.
13
posted on
06/27/2005 9:45:27 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: Borges
This has nothing to do with stealing. This ruling is like saying you can sue a gun manufacturer because guns can potentially kill people.
14
posted on
06/27/2005 9:45:58 AM PDT
by
Quick1
To: Lazamataz
There is no longer a party that represents the American citizen. Of course there is, but the two Big Government Parties aren't it.
15
posted on
06/27/2005 9:46:23 AM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Quick1
Oh I know. I was being facetious.
16
posted on
06/27/2005 9:46:46 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: mlc9852
Music-swapping won't end because of this ruling.Of course not. For example, the usenet groups are still going strong. Not that I have any firsthand experience with them, of course. ;~D
17
posted on
06/27/2005 9:46:55 AM PDT
by
ecurbh
To: Lazamataz
Think about segregation, and you may want to rephrase that.
18
posted on
06/27/2005 9:47:55 AM PDT
by
oldleft
To: Bush2000
Hmmmm. So it's okay to steal a house, but not a song. Got it.
To: ecurbh
Neither do I - just my opinion. I would never download music.:)
20
posted on
06/27/2005 9:49:27 AM PDT
by
mlc9852
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson