To: Houmatt
"This ruling gives us the exact dead opposite.
"
Maybe I missed something in the ruling, but it seems the duplication software isn't the issue here. The issue before the court was distribution software, not duplication software. Software whose purpose is the distribution of copied digital media seems to be what the court said may be actionable.
To: Mr. Nobody
But it all falls on a single word: Intent. Just who the hell defines intent? That's the question you should be asking. That's the reason you should be afraid.
184 posted on
06/27/2005 3:16:03 PM PDT by
Houmatt
(Is it too much to ask for Tiffany to forgive my transgressions?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson