Yeah, we're just a bunch of rubes. I mean, we're just not sophisticated enough to understand that interstate commerce includes activities that involve neither commerce nor interestate movement.
We don't see the hidden meaning of the takings clause to where public use includes taking private property from one person and giving it to another because the latter party can generate more tax revenues than the former.
I hope I NEVER get that educated, to where the clear meaning of words no longer has any meaning.
Bump to that.
If you have to be a top law school graduate to think like these people do, we should close up the law schools. Based upon what I saw at a recent law school graduation, that is a fine idea generally.