To: rockrr
I would call Jeanine a republican. perhaps it's her lack of conservative credentials that aren't to your liking (although I would call her VERY conservative on crime and security matters AND on abuse of women...)
It is precisely this mix of credentials that makes her hillary's worst nightmare.
What is the goal here? It isn't to get a conservative senator from ny--that's a virtual impossibility. it's to end the political career of this ruthless, unqualified, very dangerous... person.
31 posted on
06/28/2005 12:51:47 PM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: rockrr
isn't to your liking... ;)
32 posted on
06/28/2005 12:52:53 PM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
Two issues, and I would like to address them separately.
I would be the first to admit that, from my perspective out here on the west coast, the nuances of state politics are only a matter of general interest. to that end, I would prefer to elect conservatives. It doesn't make much sense to me to elect someone who doesn't reflect my interests & sensibilities just because she has an "R" behind her name (R.Reagan's 80% of something being better than nothing at all notwithstanding).
If New York is your state, and you are comfortable with the compromises involved, then I say, "Full speed ahead!".
This is separate from the issue of marginalizing the Hildebeast. I could die a happy man if I were to watch her sentencing to federal prison. I share your depiction of her as a dangerous person. I lament the profound stupidity of the people who elected her to public office.
Plz help me connect the dots - how would electing this person derail the Hildebeast machine?
33 posted on
06/28/2005 1:34:36 PM PDT by
rockrr
(Gregorovych Nyet!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson