Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

It was 5-4, so not a real precedent setter. I believe it was the same 5 who were for expansion of eminent domain.


20 posted on 06/27/2005 7:40:33 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou

Not quite the same 5....O'Connor wrote the scathing dissent in the land use case.


23 posted on 06/27/2005 7:43:09 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

No. O'Communist was in the majority on this one.


25 posted on 06/27/2005 7:43:37 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

O'Connor the swing vote once again. Reagan is rolling over in his grave. My how she's "grown" in office since Reagan appointed her to the bench.

I sincerely hope that she is the Justice rumored to be retiring after this term.


28 posted on 06/27/2005 7:44:27 AM PDT by borkrules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

Kennedy and O'Connor flipped on this one. Seems they take trade off the sanity pills before each ruling.


54 posted on 06/27/2005 8:11:33 AM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson