To: AntiGuv
It is my understanding there are TWO Ten Commandments rulings in question here.
They struck down one of them, the one in which the Commandments were by themselves....am I correct, or was there only one ruling?
60 posted on
06/27/2005 7:15:31 AM PDT by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
To: rwfromkansas
There are two rulings: One is the Texas monument, which is stand-alone on the capital grounds; the other is the Kentucky courthouse display, but the KY courthouse display involved multiple issues, which included the display alone and the display with other historical docs.
72 posted on
06/27/2005 7:18:51 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: rwfromkansas
My understanding is there are two rulings too. We only have the first one so far. From what I am reading, it has been reported that the opinion doesn't rule against a sacred text intergrated with governmental text on history and law, but rather they believe this display was religiously motivated.
118 posted on
06/27/2005 7:37:37 AM PDT by
volvox
(It is Freedom OF Religion not Freedom FROM Religion!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson